FPACX vs. TPDAX
Compare and contrast key facts about FPA Crescent Fund (FPACX) and Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX).
FPACX is managed by FPA. It was launched on Jun 1, 1993. TPDAX is managed by Timothy Plan. It was launched on Nov 3, 2009.
Performance
FPACX vs. TPDAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FPACX achieves a -1.37% return, which is significantly lower than TPDAX's 9.78% return. Over the past 10 years, FPACX has outperformed TPDAX with an annualized return of 9.59%, while TPDAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.38% annualized return.
FPACX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -1.96%
- YTD
- -1.37%
- 6M
- 1.23%
- 1Y
- 23.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.12%
- 5Y*
- 8.16%
- 10Y*
- 9.59%
TPDAX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -2.05%
- YTD
- 9.78%
- 6M
- 14.59%
- 1Y
- 32.45%
- 3Y*
- 14.33%
- 5Y*
- 9.80%
- 10Y*
- 7.38%
FPACX vs. TPDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPACX FPA Crescent Fund | -1.37% | 17.69% | 12.42% | 20.30% | -9.20% | 15.09% | 12.14% | 20.03% | -7.42% | 10.38% |
TPDAX Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund | 9.78% | 23.97% | 5.29% | 7.71% | -5.63% | 12.15% | 8.83% | 13.77% | -7.24% | 4.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between FPACX and TPDAX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined. Holding both can reduce overall portfolio volatility compared to holding either one alone.
FPACX vs. TPDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FPACX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than TPDAX's 1.37% expense ratio.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FPACX vs. TPDAX — Risk / Return Rank
FPACX
TPDAX
FPACX vs. TPDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FPA Crescent Fund (FPACX) and Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FPACX | TPDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | 2.17 | -0.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.02 | 2.82 | -0.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.41 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 3.55 | -1.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.62 | 13.15 | -5.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FPACX | TPDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 2.17 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.97 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | 0.75 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 0.60 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
FPACX vs. TPDAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FPACX drawdown since its inception was -31.60%, which is greater than TPDAX's maximum drawdown of -22.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPACX and TPDAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FPACX | TPDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.60% | -22.29% | -9.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.37% | -7.58% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.47% | -17.58% | -0.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.46% | -22.29% | -7.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.37% | -4.56% | -0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.89% | -4.94% | +1.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 2.05% | +0.07% |
Volatility
FPACX vs. TPDAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FPA Crescent Fund (FPACX) is 3.67%, while Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX) has a volatility of 3.96%. This indicates that FPACX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TPDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FPACX | TPDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.67% | 3.96% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.62% | 9.87% | -3.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.20% | 12.30% | -1.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.87% | 10.13% | +1.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.18% | 9.87% | +3.31% |
Dividends
FPACX vs. TPDAX - Dividend Comparison
FPACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.73%, more than TPDAX's 0.73% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPACX FPA Crescent Fund | 9.73% | 9.60% | 7.95% | 3.72% | 0.77% | 11.62% | 4.80% | 4.65% | 8.87% | 3.70% | 4.98% | 6.34% |
TPDAX Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund | 0.73% | 0.80% | 2.76% | 2.35% | 4.48% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 2.89% | 2.69% | 0.13% | 0.33% | 0.00% |