PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPA vs. USOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPA vs. USOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FPA) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPA achieves a 51.47% return, which is significantly lower than USOY's 62.18% return.


FPA

1D
-0.59%
1M
9.98%
YTD
51.47%
6M
51.19%
1Y
82.43%
3Y*
33.32%
5Y*
13.09%
10Y*
11.25%

USOY

1D
1.45%
1M
-3.43%
YTD
62.18%
6M
59.35%
1Y
57.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPA vs. USOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FPA
First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund
51.47%43.16%2.64%
USOY
Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF
62.18%-7.93%7.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FPA and USOY is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2024

-0.05

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between FPA and USOY has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.05 to -0.26, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPA vs. USOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPA
FPA Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPA Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPA Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

USOY
USOY Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
USOY Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
USOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
USOY Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPA vs. USOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FPA) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FPAUSOYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.24

1.89

+1.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.94

2.30

+1.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.35

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.39

4.03

+1.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.96

7.74

+12.22

FPA vs. USOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPA Sharpe Ratio is 3.24, which is higher than the USOY Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPA and USOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FPAUSOYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24

1.89

+1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.99

-0.66

Drawdowns

FPA vs. USOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPA drawdown since its inception was -52.91%, which is greater than USOY's maximum drawdown of -17.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPA and USOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPAUSOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.91%

-17.46%

-35.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.37%

-14.29%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.12%

-5.11%

+0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.49%

-6.47%

-7.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.14%

7.42%

-3.28%

Volatility

FPA vs. USOY - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FPA) has a higher volatility of 12.96% compared to Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY) at 11.62%. This indicates that FPA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPAUSOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.96%

11.62%

+1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.92%

27.18%

-5.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.55%

30.44%

-4.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.98%

26.13%

-2.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.39%

26.13%

-3.74%

FPA vs. USOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPA has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than USOY's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

FPA vs. USOY - Dividend Comparison

FPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, less than USOY's 54.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPA
First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund
3.52%4.71%3.40%3.02%4.22%5.12%1.59%3.90%2.81%3.15%2.42%1.74%
USOY
Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF
54.16%104.32%48.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPA and USOY have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPA has higher volatility (12.96%) compared to USOY (11.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPA dropped -52.91% vs USOY's -17.46%.

On 1-year performance, FPA leads with 82.43% vs 57.29% for USOY. On fees, FPA is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, USOY has been the lower-risk option at 11.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FPA has performed better with a 82.43% return vs 57.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FPA is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 1.22% for USOY.

USOY has the higher dividend yield at 54.16%, compared with 3.52% for FPA.

FPA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while USOY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FPA and 1.22% for USOY.

FPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPA and USOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer