FPA vs. NFTY
FPA (First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund) and NFTY (First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from First Trust - FPA tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Asia Pacific Ex-Japan Index while NFTY tracks the NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FPA returned 11.25%/yr vs 8.13%/yr for NFTY. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.80% expense ratio.
Performance
FPA vs. NFTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FPA achieves a 51.47% return, which is significantly higher than NFTY's -9.70% return. Over the past 10 years, FPA has outperformed NFTY with an annualized return of 11.25%, while NFTY has yielded a comparatively lower 8.13% annualized return.
FPA
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 9.98%
- YTD
- 51.47%
- 6M
- 51.19%
- 1Y
- 82.43%
- 3Y*
- 33.32%
- 5Y*
- 13.09%
- 10Y*
- 11.25%
NFTY
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- YTD
- -9.70%
- 6M
- -7.99%
- 1Y
- -8.48%
- 3Y*
- 5.72%
- 5Y*
- 4.62%
- 10Y*
- 8.13%
FPA vs. NFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPA First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund | 51.47% | 43.16% | 3.95% | 9.97% | -14.55% | 2.98% | 13.43% | 8.91% | -21.91% | 35.81% |
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | -9.70% | 5.47% | 5.18% | 24.00% | -3.46% | 26.83% | 10.04% | 0.58% | -1.51% | 21.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between FPA and NFTY is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2012 | 0.32 |
FPA vs. NFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FPA
NFTY
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
FPA
NFTY
Technology
FPA
NFTY
Financial Services
FPA
NFTY
Consumer Cyclical
FPA
NFTY
Real Estate
FPA
NFTY
-
Energy
FPA
NFTY
Utilities
FPA
NFTY
Basic Materials
FPA
NFTY
Consumer Defensive
FPA
NFTY
Communication Services
FPA
NFTY
Healthcare
FPA
NFTY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FPA vs. NFTY — Risk / Return Rank
FPA
NFTY
FPA vs. NFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FPA) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FPA | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 0.91 | +0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.39 | -0.53 | +5.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.96 | -1.39 | +21.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FPA | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.24 | -0.58 | +3.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.27 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.39 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.28 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
FPA vs. NFTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FPA drawdown since its inception was -52.91%, which is greater than NFTY's maximum drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPA and NFTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FPA | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.91% | -47.67% | -5.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.37% | -16.14% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.66% | -21.55% | +0.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.21% | -21.55% | -13.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.91% | -47.67% | -5.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.12% | -17.45% | +13.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.49% | -9.58% | -3.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.14% | 6.12% | -1.98% |
Volatility
FPA vs. NFTY - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FPA) has a higher volatility of 12.96% compared to First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) at 4.58%. This indicates that FPA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FPA | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.96% | 4.58% | +8.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.92% | 12.57% | +9.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.55% | 14.72% | +10.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.98% | 17.39% | +6.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.39% | 20.72% | +1.67% |
FPA vs. NFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FPA and NFTY have an expense ratio of 0.80%.
Dividends
FPA vs. NFTY - Dividend Comparison
FPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, more than NFTY's 1.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPA First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund | 3.52% | 4.71% | 3.40% | 3.02% | 4.22% | 5.12% | 1.59% | 3.90% | 2.81% | 3.15% | 2.42% | 1.74% |
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | 1.96% | 1.24% | 1.61% | 0.13% | 5.89% | 1.53% | 0.61% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 4.10% | 3.28% | 4.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FPA and NFTY have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FPA has higher volatility (12.96%) compared to NFTY (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPA dropped -52.91% vs NFTY's -47.67%.
On 10-year performance, FPA leads with 11.25% vs 8.13% for NFTY. Both ETFs have the same 0.80% expense ratio. On volatility, NFTY has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FPA has performed better with a 11.25% return vs 8.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FPA and NFTY have the same expense ratio: 0.80% per year.
FPA has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 1.96% for NFTY.
FPA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Asia Pacific Ex-Japan Index, while NFTY tracks NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index.
FPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FPA and NFTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer