PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOSKX vs. GSIMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOSKX vs. GSIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Overseas Fund Class K (FOSKX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOSKX achieves a 5.64% return, which is significantly lower than GSIMX's 8.14% return.


FOSKX

1D
3.76%
1M
-1.52%
6M
2.13%
YTD
5.64%
1Y
10.30%
3Y*
11.76%
5Y*
4.96%
10Y*
8.82%
ALL TIME*
5.06%

GSIMX

1D
0.62%
1M
2.06%
6M
4.43%
YTD
8.14%
1Y
15.67%
3Y*
15.47%
5Y*
9.21%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FOSKX vs. GSIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FOSKX
Fidelity Overseas Fund Class K
5.64%20.90%5.28%20.70%-24.71%19.43%15.55%28.58%-14.64%28.33%
GSIMX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
8.14%20.85%9.66%22.10%-11.06%12.50%15.77%27.64%-6.04%29.92%

Correlation

The correlation between FOSKX and GSIMX is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between FOSKX and GSIMX has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOSKX vs. GSIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FOSKX
FOSKX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
FOSKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOSKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOSKX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
FOSKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOSKX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

GSIMX
GSIMX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
GSIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FOSKX vs. GSIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Overseas Fund Class K (FOSKX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FOSKXGSIMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.30

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

2.02

-1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.31

5.51

-3.21

FOSKX vs. GSIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOSKX Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the GSIMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOSKX and GSIMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FOSKX vs. GSIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOSKX drawdown since its inception was -59.28%, which is greater than GSIMX's maximum drawdown of -28.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOSKX and GSIMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOSKXGSIMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.28%

-28.84%

-30.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.35%

-7.81%

-4.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.91%

-10.32%

-3.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.45%

-25.37%

-11.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.59%

-2.17%

-1.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.28%

-4.80%

-9.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

2.85%

+0.81%

Volatility

FOSKX vs. GSIMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Overseas Fund Class K (FOSKX) has a higher volatility of 6.22% compared to Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX) at 2.73%. This indicates that FOSKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOSKXGSIMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.22%

2.73%

+3.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.57%

8.18%

+8.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.60%

9.85%

+8.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.13%

14.25%

+3.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.09%

15.61%

+1.48%

FOSKX vs. GSIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOSKX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIMX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

FOSKX vs. GSIMX - Dividend Comparison

FOSKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, which matches GSIMX's 4.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FOSKX
Fidelity Overseas Fund Class K
4.69%4.96%1.84%1.13%0.88%4.64%0.62%1.44%6.08%0.06%2.09%1.17%
GSIMX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
4.73%5.12%11.18%2.36%4.89%2.23%0.18%0.65%0.53%0.16%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FOSKX and GSIMX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FOSKX has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to GSIMX (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOSKX dropped -59.28% vs GSIMX's -28.84%.

GSIMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOSKX and GSIMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer