PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOSCX vs. OTCKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOSCX vs. OTCKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tributary Small Company Fund (FOSCX) and MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (OTCKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOSCX achieves a 25.45% return, which is significantly higher than OTCKX's 6.12% return. Over the past 10 years, FOSCX has underperformed OTCKX with an annualized return of 9.97%, while OTCKX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.38% annualized return.


FOSCX

1D
0.38%
1M
6.46%
YTD
25.45%
6M
23.06%
1Y
28.62%
3Y*
13.58%
5Y*
8.15%
10Y*
9.97%

OTCKX

1D
0.40%
1M
4.21%
YTD
6.12%
6M
4.28%
1Y
4.16%
3Y*
15.63%
5Y*
5.85%
10Y*
13.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOSCX vs. OTCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FOSCX
Tributary Small Company Fund
25.45%-3.67%9.35%16.92%-13.17%32.03%1.21%23.18%-10.81%8.44%
OTCKX
MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6
6.12%3.75%26.48%21.50%-28.29%14.09%35.81%37.93%1.19%26.35%

Correlation

The correlation between FOSCX and OTCKX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.74

The correlation between FOSCX and OTCKX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOSCX vs. OTCKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOSCX
FOSCX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
FOSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FOSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

OTCKX
OTCKX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
OTCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OTCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
OTCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
OTCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
OTCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOSCX vs. OTCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tributary Small Company Fund (FOSCX) and MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (OTCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FOSCXOTCKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.06

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

0.31

+3.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.11

0.79

+8.32

FOSCX vs. OTCKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOSCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is higher than the OTCKX Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOSCX and OTCKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FOSCX vs. OTCKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOSCX drawdown since its inception was -52.57%, which is greater than OTCKX's maximum drawdown of -36.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOSCX and OTCKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOSCXOTCKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.57%

-36.64%

-15.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.16%

-16.31%

+7.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.00%

-20.99%

-8.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.00%

-36.64%

+7.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.05%

-36.64%

-3.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.76%

+1.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.06%

-7.35%

+0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

6.36%

-3.01%

Volatility

FOSCX vs. OTCKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tributary Small Company Fund (FOSCX) is 4.89%, while MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (OTCKX) has a volatility of 6.00%. This indicates that FOSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OTCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOSCXOTCKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

6.00%

-1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.05%

14.14%

-2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.66%

17.33%

+0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.64%

20.49%

+0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.91%

20.13%

+1.78%

FOSCX vs. OTCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOSCX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is higher than OTCKX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

FOSCX vs. OTCKX - Dividend Comparison

FOSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.06%, less than OTCKX's 14.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FOSCX
Tributary Small Company Fund
6.06%7.61%6.67%2.82%13.61%15.18%0.02%1.28%5.45%5.28%1.51%0.00%
OTCKX
MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6
14.03%14.88%16.85%0.00%0.00%3.35%0.77%0.81%4.40%8.28%5.38%2.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


FOSCX and OTCKX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OTCKX has higher volatility (6.00%) compared to FOSCX (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOSCX dropped -52.57% vs OTCKX's -36.64%.

FOSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOSCX and OTCKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer