PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FORH vs. LSAF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FORH vs. LSAF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Formidable ETF (FORH) and LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF (LSAF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FORH achieves a -0.62% return, which is significantly lower than LSAF's 19.96% return.


FORH

1D
0.34%
1M
-2.15%
6M
-3.25%
YTD
-0.62%
1Y
5.33%
3Y*
1.88%
5Y*
1.16%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.05%

LSAF

1D
-0.55%
1M
2.49%
6M
17.23%
YTD
19.96%
1Y
30.03%
3Y*
18.58%
5Y*
10.90%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$33.21K$19.16K$18.89K
$265.84K$205.64K$201.86K

FORH vs. LSAF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FORH
Formidable ETF
-0.62%16.27%-5.63%-0.69%-1.64%-0.83%
LSAF
LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF
19.96%12.01%18.09%15.48%-13.12%6.97%

Correlation

The correlation between FORH and LSAF is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2021

0.62

The correlation between FORH and LSAF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

FORH vs. LSAF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FORH
LSAF

Industrials

30.9%
10.7%

Healthcare

15.8%
7.8%

Energy

12.4%
3.3%

Basic Materials

10.9%
5.8%

Technology

7.9%
15.4%

Utilities

7.6%
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

4.1%
19.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
4.1%

Real Estate

2.7%
2.1%

Financial Services

2.6%
16.2%

Communication Services

2.0%
4.7%

Industrials

FORH
30.9%
LSAF
10.7%

Healthcare

FORH
15.8%
LSAF
7.8%

Energy

FORH
12.4%
LSAF
3.3%

Basic Materials

FORH
10.9%
LSAF
5.8%

Technology

FORH
7.9%
LSAF
15.4%

Utilities

FORH
7.6%
LSAF
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FORH
4.1%
LSAF
19.9%

Consumer Defensive

FORH
3.0%
LSAF
4.1%

Real Estate

FORH
2.7%
LSAF
2.1%

Financial Services

FORH
2.6%
LSAF
16.2%

Communication Services

FORH
2.0%
LSAF
4.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FORH vs. LSAF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FORH
FORH Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
FORH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FORH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FORH Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
FORH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
FORH Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

LSAF
LSAF Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
LSAF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSAF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSAF Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
LSAF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSAF Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FORH vs. LSAF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Formidable ETF (FORH) and LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF (LSAF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FORHLSAFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.35

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

4.41

-4.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.69

14.86

-14.17

FORH vs. LSAF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FORH Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the LSAF Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FORH and LSAF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FORH vs. LSAF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FORH drawdown since its inception was -20.73%, smaller than the maximum LSAF drawdown of -41.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FORH and LSAF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FORHLSAFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.73%

-41.67%

+20.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.80%

-6.58%

-6.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.42%

-20.26%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.73%

-24.94%

+4.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.24%

-1.48%

-9.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.02%

-6.21%

-1.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.41%

1.95%

+5.46%

Volatility

FORH vs. LSAF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Formidable ETF (FORH) is 2.92%, while LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF (LSAF) has a volatility of 4.21%. This indicates that FORH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSAF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FORHLSAFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

4.21%

-1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.16%

10.49%

-0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.98%

14.36%

+1.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.99%

18.38%

-2.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.92%

21.73%

-5.81%

FORH vs. LSAF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FORH has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than LSAF's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FORH vs. LSAF - Dividend Comparison

FORH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, more than LSAF's 0.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FORH
Formidable ETF
1.84%1.82%0.00%3.88%3.72%0.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LSAF
LeaderShares AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF
0.57%0.69%0.42%0.84%0.96%0.37%0.53%0.71%0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


FORH and LSAF have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSAF has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to FORH (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FORH dropped -20.73% vs LSAF's -41.67%.

On 5-year performance, LSAF leads with 10.90% vs 1.16% for FORH. On fees, LSAF is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, FORH has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LSAF has performed better with a 10.90% return vs 1.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LSAF is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.19% for FORH.

FORH has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 0.57% for LSAF.

They also come from different issuers: Formidable and Redwood. Their fees differ too: 1.19% for FORH and 0.75% for LSAF.

LSAF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FORH and LSAF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer