FORH vs. IBID

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FORH (Formidable ETF) and IBID (iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FORH is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Formidable, while IBID is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. FORH is actively managed, while IBID is passively managed. Over the past year, FORH returned 9.62% vs 4.00% for IBID. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FORH charges 1.19%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBID.

Performance

FORH vs. IBID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Formidable ETF (FORH) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FORH achieves a 1.13% return, which is significantly lower than IBID's 1.94% return.

FORH

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: -2.23%
• YTD: 1.13%
• 6M: -2.22%
• 1Y: 9.62%
• 3Y*: 3.79%
• 5Y*: 0.55%
• 10Y*: —

IBID

• 1D: -0.00%
• 1M: -0.25%
• YTD: 1.94%
• 6M: 1.99%
• 1Y: 4.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FORH vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FORH Formidable ETF	1.13%	16.27%	-5.63%	0.71%
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF	1.94%	5.66%	4.71%	2.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FORH and IBID is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023	0.08

The correlation between FORH and IBID shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FORH vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FORH

FORH Risk / Return Rank: 18
FORH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
FORH Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
FORH Omega Ratio Rank: 18
FORH Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
FORH Martin Ratio Rank: 16

IBID

IBID Risk / Return Rank: 96
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 96
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FORH vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Formidable ETF (FORH) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FORH	IBID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.60	3.26	-2.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.92	5.52	-4.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.74	-0.63
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.75	7.30	-6.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.43	28.77	-27.34

FORH vs. IBID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FORH Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the IBID Sharpe Ratio of 3.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FORH and IBID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FORH vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FORH drawdown since its inception was -20.73%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FORH and IBID.

Drawdown Indicators

	FORH	IBID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.73%	-1.28%	-19.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.80%	-0.55%	-12.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.42%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.68%	-0.55%	-9.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.98%	-0.22%	-7.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.72%	0.14%	+6.58%

Volatility

FORH vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison

Formidable ETF (FORH) has a higher volatility of 4.32% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.35%. This indicates that FORH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FORH	IBID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.32%	0.35%	+3.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.43%	0.86%	+9.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.06%	1.23%	+14.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.06%	2.24%	+13.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.02%	2.24%	+13.78%

FORH vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison

FORH has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

FORH vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison

FORH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than IBID's 3.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FORH Formidable ETF	1.80%	1.82%	0.00%	3.88%	3.72%	0.69%
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF	3.68%	4.43%	4.24%	0.81%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FORH and IBID in my portfolio?

FORH and IBID have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FORH or IBID?

FORH has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to IBID (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FORH dropped -20.73% vs IBID's -1.28%.

Which ETF is better, FORH or IBID?

On 1-year performance, FORH leads with 9.62% vs 4.00% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FORH or IBID?

Over the 1-year period, FORH has performed better with a 9.62% return vs 4.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FORH or IBID?

IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.19% for FORH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FORH or IBID?

IBID has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 1.80% for FORH.

What is the main difference between FORH and IBID?

FORH is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Formidable and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.19% for FORH and 0.10% for IBID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.