FOOD.L vs. XLKS.L
FOOD.L (Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD) and XLKS.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) are both Technology Equities funds - FOOD.L tracks the Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD while XLKS.L tracks the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FOOD.L returned -9.02%/yr vs 22.18%/yr for XLKS.L. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FOOD.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLKS.L.
Performance
FOOD.L vs. XLKS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FOOD.L achieves a 4.32% return, which is significantly lower than XLKS.L's 17.68% return.
FOOD.L
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- 6M
- -0.79%
- YTD
- 4.32%
- 1Y
- -3.28%
- 3Y*
- -3.92%
- 5Y*
- -9.02%
- 10Y*
- —
XLKS.L
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- -2.87%
- 6M
- 20.28%
- YTD
- 17.68%
- 1Y
- 32.56%
- 3Y*
- 31.32%
- 5Y*
- 22.18%
- 10Y*
- 25.36%
FOOD.L vs. XLKS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOOD.L Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD | 4.32% | -2.89% | -7.32% | -1.58% | -26.82% | 1.07% | 11.95% |
XLKS.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 17.68% | 24.23% | 41.72% | 60.64% | -29.12% | 34.73% | 7.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between FOOD.L and XLKS.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2020 | 0.51 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FOOD.L and XLKS.L has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FOOD.L vs. XLKS.L — Risk / Return Rank
FOOD.L
XLKS.L
FOOD.L vs. XLKS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOOD.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FOOD.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.25 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | 1.91 | -2.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.27 | 5.17 | -5.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FOOD.L vs. XLKS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOOD.L drawdown since its inception was -47.70%, which is greater than XLKS.L's maximum drawdown of -34.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOOD.L and XLKS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOOD.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.70% | -34.26% | -13.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.06% | -16.99% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.15% | -26.97% | +2.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.70% | -34.26% | -13.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.08% | -7.74% | -32.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.63% | -5.14% | -23.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.64% | 6.28% | +2.36% |
Volatility
FOOD.L vs. XLKS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOOD.L) is 4.65%, while Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L) has a volatility of 7.31%. This indicates that FOOD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLKS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FOOD.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.65% | 7.31% | -2.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.11% | 17.62% | -5.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.77% | 22.00% | -6.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.70% | 24.13% | -5.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.20% | 22.18% | -3.98% |
FOOD.L vs. XLKS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FOOD.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKS.L's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
FOOD.L vs. XLKS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FOOD.L nor XLKS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FOOD.L and XLKS.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLKS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLKS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FOOD.L.
FOOD.L tracks Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD, while XLKS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Rize ETF and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FOOD.L and 0.14% for XLKS.L.
Find the right allocation for FOOD.L and XLKS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer