PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FOOD.AX vs. QUS.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FOOD.AX vs. QUS.AX

Last updated Jul 18, 2026
Documentation

FOOD.AX (Betashares Global Agriculture Companies Currency Hedged ETF) and QUS.AX (BetaShares S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) are both Global Equities funds from BetaShares - FOOD.AX tracks the Betashares Global Agriculture Companies Currency Hedged Index while QUS.AX tracks the BetaShares S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FOOD.AX returned 4.79%/yr vs 9.64%/yr for QUS.AX. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FOOD.AX vs. QUS.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Betashares Global Agriculture Companies Currency Hedged ETF (FOOD.AX) and BetaShares S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (QUS.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOOD.AX achieves a 13.34% return, which is significantly higher than QUS.AX's 6.51% return.

FOOD.AX

1D
-0.25%
1M
2.83%
6M
6.93%
YTD
13.34%
1Y
21.10%
3Y*
7.04%
5Y*
4.79%
10Y*
—

QUS.AX

1D
1.22%
1M
2.60%
6M
3.79%
YTD
6.51%
1Y
9.88%
3Y*
12.21%
5Y*
9.64%
10Y*
11.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOOD.AX vs. QUS.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FOOD.AX
Betashares Global Agriculture Companies Currency Hedged ETF		13.34%16.69%-5.50%-5.20%-1.14%24.32%3.36%17.26%-14.88%15.67%
QUS.AX
BetaShares S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF		6.51%4.12%21.90%11.82%-5.88%37.47%-3.71%28.14%-0.86%7.24%

Correlation

The correlation between FOOD.AX and QUS.AX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2016

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Betashares Global Agriculture Companies Currency Hedged ETF

BetaShares S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF

Often compared with FOOD.AX:
FOOD.AX vs. DHHF.AXFOOD.AX vs. EX20.AXFOOD.AX vs. F100.AXFOOD.AX vs. FUEL.AXFOOD.AX vs. GEAR.AXFOOD.AX vs. GGUS.AXFOOD.AX vs. GNDQ.AX
Often compared with QUS.AX:
QUS.AX vs. CORE.AXQUS.AX vs. F100.AXQUS.AX vs. IFRA.AXQUS.AX vs. IHOO.AXQUS.AX vs. IKO.AXQUS.AX vs. OOO.AXQUS.AX vs. SEMI.AX

Return for Risk

FOOD.AX vs. QUS.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FOOD.AX
FOOD.AX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FOOD.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOOD.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOOD.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FOOD.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOOD.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
QUS.AX
QUS.AX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
QUS.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUS.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUS.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
QUS.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUS.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOOD.AX vs. QUS.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Betashares Global Agriculture Companies Currency Hedged ETF (FOOD.AX) and BetaShares S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (QUS.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

FOOD.AXQUS.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.25
0.90

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.87
1.30

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.15

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

1.08

+0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.30

2.72

+2.57

FOOD.AX vs. QUS.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOOD.AX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the QUS.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOOD.AX and QUS.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FOOD.AX vs. QUS.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOOD.AX drawdown since its inception was -39.46%, which is greater than QUS.AX's maximum drawdown of -29.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOOD.AX and QUS.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FOOD.AXQUS.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.46%

-29.54%

-9.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.06%

-8.93%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.20%

-14.85%

-7.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.67%

-16.76%

-17.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-29.54%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.10%

-1.06%

-5.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.38%

-4.40%

-6.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.90%

3.57%

+0.33%

Volatility

FOOD.AX vs. QUS.AX - Volatility Comparison

Betashares Global Agriculture Companies Currency Hedged ETF (FOOD.AX) has a higher volatility of 3.70% compared to BetaShares S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (QUS.AX) at 3.07%. This indicates that FOOD.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FOOD.AXQUS.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

3.07%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.70%

8.42%

+5.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.45%

10.78%

+5.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.47%

13.51%

+3.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

14.83%

+2.66%

Dividends

FOOD.AX vs. QUS.AX - Dividend Comparison

FOOD.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, more than QUS.AX's 1.96% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FOOD.AX
Betashares Global Agriculture Companies Currency Hedged ETF		3.97%0.00%1.48%0.00%2.57%3.39%0.00%0.46%3.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QUS.AX
BetaShares S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF		1.96%2.10%2.33%2.28%3.29%1.85%12.79%4.07%2.57%1.47%2.58%1.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

FOOD.AX and QUS.AX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FOOD.AX tracks Betashares Global Agriculture Companies Currency Hedged Index, while QUS.AX tracks BetaShares S&P 500 Equal Weight Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOOD.AX and QUS.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer