PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOMCX vs. VTBNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOMCX vs. VTBNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Mortgage Securities Fund Class C (FOMCX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund (VTBNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOMCX achieves a 0.38% return, which is significantly higher than VTBNX's 0.33% return. Over the past 10 years, FOMCX has underperformed VTBNX with an annualized return of 0.12%, while VTBNX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.55% annualized return.


FOMCX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.33%
YTD
0.38%
6M
0.38%
1Y
5.70%
3Y*
2.98%
5Y*
-1.02%
10Y*
0.12%

VTBNX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.45%
YTD
0.33%
6M
0.25%
1Y
5.21%
3Y*
4.01%
5Y*
0.20%
10Y*
1.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOMCX vs. VTBNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FOMCX
Fidelity Advisor Mortgage Securities Fund Class C
0.38%7.11%-0.62%3.52%-13.36%-2.19%3.27%5.12%-0.40%1.24%
VTBNX
Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund
0.33%7.18%1.32%5.68%-13.12%-1.82%7.39%8.71%-0.27%3.62%

Correlation

The correlation between FOMCX and VTBNX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2016

0.88

The correlation between FOMCX and VTBNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOMCX vs. VTBNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOMCX
FOMCX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
FOMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FOMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

VTBNX
VTBNX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
VTBNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTBNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTBNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
VTBNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTBNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOMCX vs. VTBNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Mortgage Securities Fund Class C (FOMCX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund (VTBNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FOMCXVTBNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.23

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

1.85

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.20

5.53

+0.67

FOMCX vs. VTBNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOMCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the VTBNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOMCX and VTBNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FOMCXVTBNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

1.34

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

0.03

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

0.32

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.38

+0.02

Drawdowns

FOMCX vs. VTBNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOMCX drawdown since its inception was -21.05%, which is greater than VTBNX's maximum drawdown of -18.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOMCX and VTBNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOMCXVTBNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.05%

-18.71%

-2.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.05%

-2.83%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.34%

-5.97%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.43%

-18.05%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.05%

-18.71%

-2.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.40%

-2.21%

-4.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.91%

-4.87%

+1.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

0.95%

-0.03%

Volatility

FOMCX vs. VTBNX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Mortgage Securities Fund Class C (FOMCX) has a higher volatility of 1.47% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund (VTBNX) at 1.33%. This indicates that FOMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTBNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOMCXVTBNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.47%

1.33%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.81%

2.81%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.98%

3.93%

+0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.75%

5.96%

+0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.09%

4.93%

+0.16%

FOMCX vs. VTBNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOMCX has a 1.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VTBNX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

FOMCX vs. VTBNX - Dividend Comparison

FOMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, less than VTBNX's 4.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FOMCX
Fidelity Advisor Mortgage Securities Fund Class C
2.76%2.80%2.52%2.20%0.53%0.43%1.38%1.38%1.50%1.51%1.45%1.05%
VTBNX
Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund
4.06%3.95%3.77%3.13%2.54%1.82%3.12%2.79%2.56%2.52%2.55%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FOMCX and VTBNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FOMCX has higher volatility (1.47%) compared to VTBNX (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOMCX dropped -21.05% vs VTBNX's -18.71%.

FOMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOMCX and VTBNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer