FOGB.L vs. FOOD.L
FOGB.L (Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD) and FOOD.L (Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD) are both Technology Equities funds from Rize ETF tracking the Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FOGB.L returned -8.73%/yr vs -8.75%/yr for FOOD.L. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.45% expense ratio.
Performance
FOGB.L vs. FOOD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FOGB.L is traded in GBp, while FOOD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FOOD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FOGB.L achieves a 3.33% return, which is significantly lower than FOOD.L's 3.64% return.
FOGB.L
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- 6M
- -1.77%
- YTD
- 3.33%
- 1Y
- -4.66%
- 3Y*
- -5.08%
- 5Y*
- -8.73%
- 10Y*
- —
FOOD.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- 6M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- 3.64%
- 1Y
- -4.54%
- 3Y*
- -5.09%
- 5Y*
- -8.75%
- 10Y*
- —
FOGB.L vs. FOOD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOGB.L Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD | 3.33% | -9.49% | -5.72% | -6.98% | -18.26% | 2.56% | 9.19% |
FOOD.L Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD | 3.64% | -9.81% | -5.70% | -6.50% | -18.12% | 2.03% | 8.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between FOGB.L and FOOD.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020 | 0.90 |
The correlation between FOGB.L and FOOD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FOGB.L vs. FOOD.L — Risk / Return Rank
FOGB.L
FOOD.L
FOGB.L vs. FOOD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOGB.L) and Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOOD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FOGB.L | FOOD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.25 | -0.25 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.41 | -0.42 | +0.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FOGB.L vs. FOOD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOGB.L drawdown since its inception was -43.46%, roughly equal to the maximum FOOD.L drawdown of -43.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOGB.L and FOOD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOGB.L | FOOD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.46% | -43.55% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.73% | -13.38% | +0.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.44% | -23.78% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.46% | -43.55% | +0.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.99% | -38.86% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.51% | -24.35% | -0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.79% | 7.91% | -0.12% |
Volatility
FOGB.L vs. FOOD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOGB.L) is 4.25%, while Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOOD.L) has a volatility of 5.08%. This indicates that FOGB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOOD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FOGB.L | FOOD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.25% | 5.08% | -0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.01% | 12.42% | -1.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.10% | 15.53% | -0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.83% | 17.24% | -1.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.43% | 16.75% | -1.32% |
FOGB.L vs. FOOD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FOGB.L and FOOD.L have an expense ratio of 0.45%.
Dividends
FOGB.L vs. FOOD.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FOGB.L nor FOOD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FOGB.L and FOOD.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FOGB.L and FOOD.L have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.
Both ETFs track Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD.
Find the right allocation for FOGB.L and FOOD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer