PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOCSX vs. NESIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FOCSX vs. NESIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Small Cap Growth K6 Fund (FOCSX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional (NESIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FOCSX vs. NESIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FOCSX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth K6 Fund
-5.28%11.33%21.04%19.62%-25.01%10.50%37.44%36.25%-4.60%16.21%
NESIX
Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional
9.63%11.16%13.47%5.85%-29.71%11.36%73.06%55.28%-4.87%9.61%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOCSX achieves a -5.28% return, which is significantly lower than NESIX's 9.63% return.


FOCSX

1D
-2.50%
1M
-9.99%
YTD
-5.28%
6M
-2.43%
1Y
18.34%
3Y*
12.51%
5Y*
3.81%
10Y*

NESIX

1D
-4.46%
1M
-7.08%
YTD
9.63%
6M
12.40%
1Y
48.73%
3Y*
11.47%
5Y*
1.26%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FOCSX vs. NESIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOCSX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than NESIX's 1.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FOCSX vs. NESIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOCSX
FOCSX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FOCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FOCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

NESIX
NESIX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
NESIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NESIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
NESIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
NESIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
NESIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOCSX vs. NESIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small Cap Growth K6 Fund (FOCSX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional (NESIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FOCSXNESIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.73

1.34

-0.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.16

1.91

-0.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.25

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

2.44

-1.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.83

8.21

-4.38

FOCSX vs. NESIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOCSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the NESIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOCSX and NESIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FOCSXNESIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

1.34

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.04

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.53

-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between FOCSX and NESIX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FOCSX vs. NESIX - Dividend Comparison

FOCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, while NESIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FOCSX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth K6 Fund
2.90%2.74%2.26%0.23%0.05%31.03%2.78%0.00%2.47%0.09%
NESIX
Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.93%23.92%13.26%8.25%21.96%8.89%

Drawdowns

FOCSX vs. NESIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOCSX drawdown since its inception was -38.79%, smaller than the maximum NESIX drawdown of -49.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOCSX and NESIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FOCSXNESIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.79%

-49.61%

+10.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.80%

-17.25%

+3.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.79%

-49.61%

+10.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.98%

-9.15%

-3.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.13%

-15.27%

+4.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.75%

5.12%

-1.37%

Volatility

FOCSX vs. NESIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Small Cap Growth K6 Fund (FOCSX) is 8.43%, while Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional (NESIX) has a volatility of 10.99%. This indicates that FOCSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NESIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FOCSXNESIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.43%

10.99%

-2.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.21%

22.90%

-6.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.71%

35.06%

-10.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.33%

29.10%

-5.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.56%

26.30%

-2.74%