PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOCKX vs. FZROX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOCKX vs. FZROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOCKX achieves a 29.57% return, which is significantly higher than FZROX's 10.74% return.


FOCKX

1D
2.02%
1M
5.85%
YTD
29.57%
6M
29.94%
1Y
60.92%
3Y*
34.63%
5Y*
19.05%
10Y*
23.26%

FZROX

1D
1.16%
1M
0.93%
YTD
10.74%
6M
10.00%
1Y
27.63%
3Y*
20.80%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOCKX vs. FZROX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FOCKX
Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K
29.57%22.28%38.91%42.92%-32.07%25.06%46.83%39.36%-16.62%
FZROX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund
10.74%17.23%23.94%26.20%-19.21%26.00%20.51%31.15%-12.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FOCKX and FZROX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2018

0.90

The correlation between FOCKX and FZROX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOCKX vs. FZROX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOCKX
FOCKX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FOCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FOCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

FZROX
FZROX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FZROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZROX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FZROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZROX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOCKX vs. FZROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FOCKXFZROXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.38

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.40

3.10

+2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.89

13.86

+9.03

FOCKX vs. FZROX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOCKX Sharpe Ratio is 3.13, which is higher than the FZROX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOCKX and FZROX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FOCKX vs. FZROX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOCKX drawdown since its inception was -53.33%, which is greater than FZROX's maximum drawdown of -34.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOCKX and FZROX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOCKXFZROXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.33%

-34.96%

-18.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.28%

-8.89%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.83%

-19.38%

-5.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.97%

-25.12%

-11.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-1.13%

+1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.36%

-5.49%

-2.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

1.98%

+0.67%

Volatility

FOCKX vs. FZROX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX) has a higher volatility of 8.83% compared to Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX) at 4.94%. This indicates that FOCKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FZROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOCKXFZROXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.83%

4.94%

+3.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.86%

10.16%

+5.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.46%

12.85%

+6.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.94%

17.53%

+5.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.58%

20.13%

+2.45%

FOCKX vs. FZROX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOCKX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than FZROX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FOCKX vs. FZROX - Dividend Comparison

FOCKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.83%, more than FZROX's 0.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FOCKX
Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K
5.83%7.56%16.42%0.09%3.97%11.34%6.18%7.49%7.81%4.85%3.25%5.42%
FZROX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund
0.92%1.02%1.16%1.36%1.57%1.25%1.27%1.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FOCKX and FZROX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FOCKX has higher volatility (8.83%) compared to FZROX (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOCKX dropped -53.33% vs FZROX's -34.96%.

FOCKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOCKX and FZROX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer