FOCKX vs. AMRGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX) and American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX).
FOCKX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2008. AMRGX is managed by American Growth. It was launched on Jul 31, 1958.
Performance
FOCKX vs. AMRGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FOCKX vs. AMRGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOCKX Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K | -7.76% | 22.28% | 38.91% | 42.92% | -32.07% | 25.06% | 46.83% | 39.36% | -3.18% | 38.78% |
AMRGX American Growth Fund Series One | -1.31% | 11.18% | 16.61% | 24.38% | -19.93% | 15.64% | 18.65% | 36.73% | -9.07% | 13.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FOCKX achieves a -7.76% return, which is significantly lower than AMRGX's -1.31% return. Over the past 10 years, FOCKX has outperformed AMRGX with an annualized return of 19.31%, while AMRGX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.41% annualized return.
FOCKX
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- -8.64%
- YTD
- -7.76%
- 6M
- -2.82%
- 1Y
- 27.02%
- 3Y*
- 24.78%
- 5Y*
- 12.96%
- 10Y*
- 19.31%
AMRGX
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- -10.92%
- YTD
- -1.31%
- 6M
- 7.51%
- 1Y
- 16.26%
- 3Y*
- 14.01%
- 5Y*
- 7.34%
- 10Y*
- 10.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FOCKX vs. AMRGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FOCKX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than AMRGX's 4.07% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FOCKX vs. AMRGX — Risk / Return Rank
FOCKX
AMRGX
FOCKX vs. AMRGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX) and American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FOCKX | AMRGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | 0.62 | +0.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.76 | 1.12 | +0.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.19 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 0.99 | +0.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.07 | 2.37 | +4.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FOCKX | AMRGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 0.62 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.34 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 | 0.49 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.10 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between FOCKX and AMRGX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FOCKX vs. AMRGX - Dividend Comparison
FOCKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.19%, less than AMRGX's 18.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOCKX Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K | 8.19% | 7.56% | 16.42% | 0.09% | 3.97% | 11.34% | 6.18% | 7.49% | 7.81% | 4.85% | 3.25% | 5.42% |
AMRGX American Growth Fund Series One | 18.06% | 17.82% | 12.39% | 8.17% | 7.77% | 12.21% | 2.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FOCKX vs. AMRGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOCKX drawdown since its inception was -90.14%, which is greater than AMRGX's maximum drawdown of -80.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOCKX and AMRGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOCKX | AMRGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.14% | -80.32% | -9.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.55% | -13.98% | +1.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.97% | -35.42% | -1.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.14% | -35.42% | -54.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.28% | -13.98% | +2.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.47% | -40.45% | +31.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 5.82% | -2.59% |
Volatility
FOCKX vs. AMRGX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX) has a higher volatility of 6.63% compared to American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX) at 6.18%. This indicates that FOCKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMRGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FOCKX | AMRGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.63% | 6.18% | +0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.55% | 23.49% | -9.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.78% | 28.26% | -5.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.54% | 21.84% | +0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 288.89% | 21.30% | +267.59% |