FNYTX vs. MUC

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

FNYTX (Franklin New York Tax Free Income Fund) and MUC (BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, FNYTX returned 1.68%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for MUC. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FNYTX charges 0.66%/yr vs 2.14%/yr for MUC.

Performance

FNYTX vs. MUC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin New York Tax Free Income Fund (FNYTX) and BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNYTX achieves a 2.23% return, which is significantly lower than MUC's 5.94% return. Over the past 10 years, FNYTX has outperformed MUC with an annualized return of 1.68%, while MUC has yielded a comparatively lower 0.80% annualized return.

FNYTX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 1.53%
• YTD: 2.23%
• 6M: 2.65%
• 1Y: 7.99%
• 3Y*: 3.94%
• 5Y*: 0.59%
• 10Y*: 1.68%

MUC

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 2.28%
• YTD: 5.94%
• 6M: 6.24%
• 1Y: 12.49%
• 3Y*: 6.04%
• 5Y*: -2.29%
• 10Y*: 0.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNYTX vs. MUC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNYTX Franklin New York Tax Free Income Fund	2.23%	3.90%	2.47%	6.93%	-12.00%	1.85%	4.75%	7.56%	0.43%	2.45%
MUC BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund	5.94%	5.96%	0.76%	7.86%	-26.81%	7.38%	11.85%	18.12%	-9.00%	6.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FNYTX and MUC is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 1998	0.27

The correlation between FNYTX and MUC shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.49 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FNYTX vs. MUC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNYTX

FNYTX Risk / Return Rank: 75
FNYTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FNYTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FNYTX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FNYTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
FNYTX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

MUC

MUC Risk / Return Rank: 42
MUC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
MUC Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
MUC Omega Ratio Rank: 44
MUC Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
MUC Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNYTX vs. MUC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin New York Tax Free Income Fund (FNYTX) and BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNYTX	MUC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.42	1.54	+0.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.72	2.41	+1.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.30	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.55	1.92	+0.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.82	7.79	+1.03

FNYTX vs. MUC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNYTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the MUC Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNYTX and MUC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNYTX vs. MUC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNYTX drawdown since its inception was -18.90%, smaller than the maximum MUC drawdown of -48.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNYTX and MUC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNYTX	MUC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.90%	-48.97%	+30.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.10%	-6.53%	+3.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.29%	-14.51%	+7.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.45%	-38.29%	+20.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.45%	-38.29%	+20.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-14.99%	+14.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.53%	-9.91%	+7.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.89%	1.61%	-0.72%

Volatility

FNYTX vs. MUC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin New York Tax Free Income Fund (FNYTX) is 0.83%, while BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC) has a volatility of 2.01%. This indicates that FNYTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNYTX	MUC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.83%	2.01%	-1.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.44%	6.25%	-3.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.27%	8.16%	-4.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.65%	11.51%	-6.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.41%	11.89%	-7.48%

FNYTX vs. MUC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNYTX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than MUC's 2.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNYTX vs. MUC - Dividend Comparison

FNYTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, less than MUC's 5.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNYTX Franklin New York Tax Free Income Fund	3.50%	4.57%	3.85%	2.78%	2.84%	2.45%	2.64%	3.41%	3.38%	3.43%	3.63%	3.60%
MUC BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund	5.89%	6.06%	5.62%	3.84%	5.79%	4.27%	3.96%	3.90%	4.99%	5.14%	5.45%	5.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNYTX and MUC in my portfolio?

FNYTX and MUC have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNYTX or MUC?

MUC has higher volatility (2.01%) compared to FNYTX (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNYTX dropped -18.90% vs MUC's -48.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNYTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.