PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNYPX vs. APUSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNYPX vs. APUSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor New York Municipal Income Fund Class M (FNYPX) and Cavanal Hill Ultra Short Tax-Free Income Fund (APUSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNYPX achieves a 1.70% return, which is significantly higher than APUSX's 0.81% return.


FNYPX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.72%
YTD
1.70%
6M
2.02%
1Y
7.55%
3Y*
3.79%
5Y*
0.48%
10Y*
1.68%

APUSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.19%
YTD
0.81%
6M
1.02%
1Y
2.47%
3Y*
3.37%
5Y*
2.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNYPX vs. APUSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FNYPX
Fidelity Advisor New York Municipal Income Fund Class M
1.70%4.66%0.82%6.98%-11.23%2.07%3.69%
APUSX
Cavanal Hill Ultra Short Tax-Free Income Fund
0.81%3.88%3.65%2.63%-0.18%-0.40%0.15%

Correlation

The correlation between FNYPX and APUSX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020

0.26

The correlation between FNYPX and APUSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (3 years) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNYPX vs. APUSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNYPX
FNYPX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FNYPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNYPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNYPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FNYPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNYPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

APUSX
APUSX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
APUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
APUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
APUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
APUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNYPX vs. APUSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor New York Municipal Income Fund Class M (FNYPX) and Cavanal Hill Ultra Short Tax-Free Income Fund (APUSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNYPXAPUSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

5.06

-3.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

24.81

-22.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.02

68.37

-60.35

FNYPX vs. APUSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNYPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the APUSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNYPX and APUSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNYPXAPUSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

3.20

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

1.68

-1.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

1.45

-0.88

Drawdowns

FNYPX vs. APUSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNYPX drawdown since its inception was -17.16%, which is greater than APUSX's maximum drawdown of -1.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNYPX and APUSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNYPXAPUSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.16%

-1.64%

-15.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.31%

-0.10%

-3.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.52%

-1.00%

-5.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.27%

-1.35%

-14.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

0.00%

-0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.16%

-0.29%

-2.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

0.04%

+0.94%

Volatility

FNYPX vs. APUSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor New York Municipal Income Fund Class M (FNYPX) has a higher volatility of 1.23% compared to Cavanal Hill Ultra Short Tax-Free Income Fund (APUSX) at 0.24%. This indicates that FNYPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APUSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNYPXAPUSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

0.24%

+0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.34%

0.50%

+1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.00%

0.78%

+2.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.32%

1.25%

+3.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.25%

1.13%

+3.12%

FNYPX vs. APUSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNYPX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than APUSX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNYPX vs. APUSX - Dividend Comparison

FNYPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, more than APUSX's 2.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APUSX
Cavanal Hill Ultra Short Tax-Free Income Fund
2.44%3.69%3.68%1.69%0.33%0.00%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNYPX
Fidelity Advisor New York Municipal Income Fund Class M
2.66%3.43%2.11%2.17%1.62%2.27%2.49%2.59%2.53%3.36%3.93%3.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNYPX and APUSX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNYPX has higher volatility (1.23%) compared to APUSX (0.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNYPX dropped -17.16% vs APUSX's -1.64%.

APUSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNYPX and APUSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer