FNY vs. KMID
FNY (First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund) and KMID (Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. FNY is passively managed, while KMID is actively managed. Over the past year, FNY returned 25.48% vs -0.13% for KMID. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FNY charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for KMID.
Performance
FNY vs. KMID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNY achieves a 14.53% return, which is significantly higher than KMID's 3.26% return.
FNY
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- 6M
- 7.71%
- YTD
- 14.53%
- 1Y
- 25.48%
- 3Y*
- 16.82%
- 5Y*
- 8.30%
- 10Y*
- 13.34%
KMID
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- 6M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- 3.26%
- 1Y
- -0.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNY vs. KMID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FNY First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund | 14.53% | 14.03% | -1.73% |
KMID Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF | 3.26% | 0.31% | -3.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNY and KMID is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2024 | 0.75 |
The correlation between FNY and KMID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
FNY vs. KMID - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FNY
KMID
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
FNY
KMID
Technology
FNY
KMID
Healthcare
FNY
KMID
Consumer Cyclical
FNY
KMID
Financial Services
FNY
KMID
Real Estate
FNY
KMID
-
Communication Services
FNY
KMID
-
Consumer Defensive
FNY
KMID
-
Basic Materials
FNY
KMID
-
Energy
FNY
KMID
-
Utilities
FNY
KMID
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNY vs. KMID — Risk / Return Rank
FNY
KMID
FNY vs. KMID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FNY) and Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF (KMID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNY | KMID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.01 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | -0.01 | +2.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.43 | -0.03 | +7.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNY vs. KMID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNY drawdown since its inception was -38.91%, which is greater than KMID's maximum drawdown of -18.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNY and KMID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNY | KMID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.91% | -18.89% | -20.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.01% | -10.71% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.78% | -3.98% | -1.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.56% | -5.69% | -1.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 4.43% | -0.99% |
Volatility
FNY vs. KMID - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FNY) has a higher volatility of 5.71% compared to Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF (KMID) at 4.06%. This indicates that FNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNY | KMID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.71% | 4.06% | +1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.98% | 11.62% | +4.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.97% | 14.88% | +6.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.44% | 16.83% | +5.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.42% | 16.83% | +5.59% |
FNY vs. KMID - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNY has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than KMID's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNY vs. KMID - Dividend Comparison
FNY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNY First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.56% | 0.24% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.28% | 0.06% | 0.21% | 0.60% | 0.46% |
KMID Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF | 0.11% | 0.06% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNY and KMID have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNY has higher volatility (5.71%) compared to KMID (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNY dropped -38.91% vs KMID's -18.89%.
On 1-year performance, FNY leads with 25.48% vs -0.13% for KMID. On fees, FNY is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, KMID has been the lower-risk option at 4.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FNY has performed better with a 25.48% return vs -0.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FNY is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for KMID.
KMID has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for FNY.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Virtus. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FNY and 0.80% for KMID.
FNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNY and KMID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer