PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNWFX vs. RNWGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNWFX vs. RNWGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds New World Fund Class F-3 (FNWFX) and American Funds New World Fund® Class R-6 (RNWGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FNWFX having a 16.80% return and RNWGX slightly lower at 16.79%.


FNWFX

1D
0.39%
1M
7.07%
YTD
16.80%
6M
18.71%
1Y
35.93%
3Y*
19.67%
5Y*
7.03%
10Y*

RNWGX

1D
0.38%
1M
7.06%
YTD
16.79%
6M
18.72%
1Y
35.93%
3Y*
19.67%
5Y*
7.03%
10Y*
11.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNWFX vs. RNWGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNWFX
American Funds New World Fund Class F-3
16.80%28.67%6.88%16.24%-21.77%5.09%25.30%28.02%-12.00%25.87%
RNWGX
American Funds New World Fund® Class R-6
16.79%28.67%6.88%16.26%-21.77%5.09%25.30%28.03%-12.00%25.90%

Correlation

The correlation between FNWFX and RNWGX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

1.00

The correlation between FNWFX and RNWGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNWFX vs. RNWGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNWFX
FNWFX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FNWFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNWFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNWFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FNWFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNWFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

RNWGX
RNWGX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
RNWGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNWGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNWGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
RNWGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNWGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNWFX vs. RNWGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds New World Fund Class F-3 (FNWFX) and American Funds New World Fund® Class R-6 (RNWGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNWFXRNWGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.52

2.52

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.51

3.51

0.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.48

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

2.79

0.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.50

11.49

+0.01

FNWFX vs. RNWGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNWFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the RNWGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNWFX and RNWGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNWFXRNWGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

2.52

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.46

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.53

+0.17

Drawdowns

FNWFX vs. RNWGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNWFX drawdown since its inception was -33.40%, roughly equal to the maximum RNWGX drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNWFX and RNWGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNWFXRNWGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.40%

-33.40%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.00%

-13.00%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.00%

-15.00%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.40%

-33.40%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.68%

-8.06%

-0.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

3.16%

0.00%

Volatility

FNWFX vs. RNWGX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds New World Fund Class F-3 (FNWFX) and American Funds New World Fund® Class R-6 (RNWGX) have volatilities of 5.50% and 5.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNWFXRNWGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.50%

5.50%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.50%

12.50%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.74%

14.75%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.42%

15.42%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.40%

16.14%

+0.26%

FNWFX vs. RNWGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FNWFX and RNWGX have an expense ratio of 0.57%.


Dividends

FNWFX vs. RNWGX - Dividend Comparison

FNWFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%, which matches RNWGX's 5.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNWFX
American Funds New World Fund Class F-3
5.21%6.09%4.10%2.88%1.33%7.32%0.43%4.04%2.70%2.27%0.00%0.00%
RNWGX
American Funds New World Fund® Class R-6
5.21%6.09%4.11%2.88%1.33%7.32%0.44%4.05%2.71%2.26%1.37%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FNWFX and RNWGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RNWGX has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to FNWFX (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNWFX dropped -33.40% vs RNWGX's -33.40%.

FNWFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNWFX and RNWGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer