PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNWFX vs. EMPTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNWFX vs. EMPTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds New World Fund Class F-3 (FNWFX) and UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund (EMPTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNWFX achieves a 16.80% return, which is significantly lower than EMPTX's 28.52% return.


FNWFX

1D
0.39%
1M
7.07%
YTD
16.80%
6M
18.71%
1Y
35.93%
3Y*
19.67%
5Y*
7.03%
10Y*

EMPTX

1D
1.58%
1M
10.73%
YTD
28.52%
6M
32.58%
1Y
65.53%
3Y*
26.32%
5Y*
6.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNWFX vs. EMPTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FNWFX
American Funds New World Fund Class F-3
16.80%28.67%6.88%16.24%-21.77%5.09%25.30%28.02%-13.33%
EMPTX
UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund
28.52%43.82%2.51%8.92%-25.38%-9.36%24.79%14.98%0.55%

Correlation

The correlation between FNWFX and EMPTX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2018

0.73

The correlation between FNWFX and EMPTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNWFX vs. EMPTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNWFX
FNWFX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FNWFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNWFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNWFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FNWFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNWFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

EMPTX
EMPTX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
EMPTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMPTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMPTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
EMPTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMPTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNWFX vs. EMPTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds New World Fund Class F-3 (FNWFX) and UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund (EMPTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNWFXEMPTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.52

3.91

-1.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.51

4.71

-1.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.70

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

4.70

-1.91

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.50

19.23

-7.73

FNWFX vs. EMPTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNWFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is lower than the EMPTX Sharpe Ratio of 3.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNWFX and EMPTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNWFXEMPTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

3.91

-1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.33

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.48

+0.22

Drawdowns

FNWFX vs. EMPTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNWFX drawdown since its inception was -33.40%, smaller than the maximum EMPTX drawdown of -46.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNWFX and EMPTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNWFXEMPTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.40%

-46.03%

+12.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.00%

-14.50%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.00%

-15.50%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.40%

-41.46%

+8.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.68%

-18.38%

+9.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

3.54%

-0.38%

Volatility

FNWFX vs. EMPTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds New World Fund Class F-3 (FNWFX) is 5.50%, while UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund (EMPTX) has a volatility of 7.70%. This indicates that FNWFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMPTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNWFXEMPTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.50%

7.70%

-2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.50%

16.08%

-3.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.74%

18.71%

-3.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.42%

19.26%

-3.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.40%

19.37%

-2.97%

FNWFX vs. EMPTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNWFX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than EMPTX's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNWFX vs. EMPTX - Dividend Comparison

FNWFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%, more than EMPTX's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMPTX
UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opportunity Fund
1.49%1.91%3.40%3.20%3.84%11.93%1.50%2.75%0.54%0.00%
FNWFX
American Funds New World Fund Class F-3
5.21%6.09%4.10%2.88%1.33%7.32%0.43%4.04%2.70%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNWFX and EMPTX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMPTX has higher volatility (7.70%) compared to FNWFX (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNWFX dropped -33.40% vs EMPTX's -46.03%.

EMPTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.91 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNWFX and EMPTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer