PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNV vs. DRD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FNV vs. DRD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) and DRDGOLD Limited (DRD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNV achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly higher than DRD's -23.58% return. Over the past 10 years, FNV has underperformed DRD with an annualized return of 12.96%, while DRD has yielded a comparatively higher 20.74% annualized return.


FNV

1D
0.75%
1M
-12.83%
YTD
1.43%
6M
-2.28%
1Y
25.80%
3Y*
14.28%
5Y*
7.76%
10Y*
12.96%

DRD

1D
2.27%
1M
-20.60%
YTD
-23.58%
6M
-24.53%
1Y
67.15%
3Y*
29.82%
5Y*
17.87%
10Y*
20.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNV vs. DRD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNV
Franco-Nevada Corporation
1.43%77.81%7.41%-17.96%-0.39%11.57%22.31%48.92%-11.00%35.45%
DRD
DRDGOLD Limited
-23.58%267.16%11.55%13.26%-7.63%-23.16%141.46%153.56%-35.27%-37.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FNV and DRD is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2007

0.54

The correlation between FNV and DRD shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.73 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FNV:

$40.47B

DRD:

$201.84M

EPS

FNV:

$7.10

DRD:

ZAR 100.99

PE Ratio

FNV:

29.51

DRD:

0.23

PEG Ratio

FNV:

0.62

DRD:

0.01

PS Ratio

FNV:

19.22

DRD:

0.07

PB Ratio

FNV:

4.98

DRD:

0.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

FNV:

$2.10B

DRD:

ZAR 15.96B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FNV:

$1.61B

DRD:

ZAR 6.44B

EBITDA (TTM)

FNV:

$1.96B

DRD:

ZAR 7.17B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNV vs. DRD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNV
FNV Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FNV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNV Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FNV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNV Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

DRD
DRD Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
DRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRD Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
DRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRD Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNV vs. DRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) and DRDGOLD Limited (DRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNVDRDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.21

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

1.55

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.50

4.06

-1.56

FNV vs. DRD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNV Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the DRD Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNV and DRD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNV vs. DRD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNV drawdown since its inception was -58.76%, smaller than the maximum DRD drawdown of -98.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNV and DRD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNVDRDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.76%

-98.44%

+39.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.68%

-43.51%

+17.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.64%

-45.13%

+15.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.12%

-57.22%

+20.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.12%

-80.31%

+43.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.13%

-48.48%

+23.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.97%

-81.86%

+67.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.33%

16.59%

-6.26%

Volatility

FNV vs. DRD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) is 11.92%, while DRDGOLD Limited (DRD) has a volatility of 17.37%. This indicates that FNV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNVDRDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.92%

17.37%

-5.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.98%

43.75%

-13.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.97%

58.02%

-22.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.32%

51.50%

-21.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.17%

58.03%

-27.86%

Dividends

FNV vs. DRD - Dividend Comparison

FNV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than DRD's 2.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRD
DRDGOLD Limited
2.30%1.26%2.53%5.74%5.00%6.54%4.47%2.65%2.05%1.12%6.15%3.73%
FNV
Franco-Nevada Corporation
0.78%0.73%1.22%1.23%0.94%1.10%0.82%0.96%1.35%1.14%1.46%1.81%

Financials

FNV vs. DRD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Franco-Nevada Corporation and DRDGOLD Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
641.09M
4.81B
(FNV) Total Revenue
(DRD) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. FNV values in USD, DRD values in ZAR

FNV vs. DRD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Franco-Nevada Corporation and DRDGOLD Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
80.9%
48.2%
Portfolio components
FNV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Franco-Nevada Corporation reported a gross profit of 518.42M and revenue of 641.09M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.9%.

DRD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DRDGOLD Limited reported a gross profit of 2.32B and revenue of 4.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.2%.

FNV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Franco-Nevada Corporation reported an operating income of 503.23M and revenue of 641.09M, resulting in an operating margin of 78.5%.

DRD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DRDGOLD Limited reported an operating income of 2.20B and revenue of 4.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.8%.

FNV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Franco-Nevada Corporation reported a net income of 462.11M and revenue of 641.09M, resulting in a net margin of 72.1%.

DRD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DRDGOLD Limited reported a net income of 1.84B and revenue of 4.81B, resulting in a net margin of 38.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FNV and DRD have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRD has higher volatility (17.37%) compared to FNV (11.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNV dropped -58.76% vs DRD's -98.44%.

DRD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNV and DRD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer