PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNV vs. BIB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNV vs. BIB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) and ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNV achieves a 3.59% return, which is significantly lower than BIB's 12.50% return. Over the past 10 years, FNV has outperformed BIB with an annualized return of 12.65%, while BIB has yielded a comparatively lower 9.71% annualized return.


FNV

1D
-3.09%
1M
-5.22%
YTD
3.59%
6M
-0.52%
1Y
28.87%
3Y*
16.58%
5Y*
9.10%
10Y*
12.65%

BIB

1D
1.97%
1M
9.49%
YTD
12.50%
6M
8.62%
1Y
100.86%
3Y*
19.65%
5Y*
-0.74%
10Y*
9.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNV vs. BIB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNV
Franco-Nevada Corporation
3.59%77.81%7.41%-17.96%-0.39%11.57%22.31%48.92%-11.00%35.45%
BIB
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology
12.50%59.21%-9.84%-1.06%-28.85%-6.02%39.79%46.71%-24.93%40.49%

Correlation

The correlation between FNV and BIB is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2010

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNV vs. BIB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNV
FNV Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FNV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNV Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FNV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNV Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

BIB
BIB Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
BIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIB Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
BIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIB Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNV vs. BIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) and ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNVBIBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.36

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

5.99

-4.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.72

18.30

-15.58

FNV vs. BIB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNV Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the BIB Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNV and BIB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNV vs. BIB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNV drawdown since its inception was -58.76%, smaller than the maximum BIB drawdown of -67.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNV and BIB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNVBIBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.76%

-67.24%

+8.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.68%

-16.92%

-8.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.64%

-45.30%

+15.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.12%

-65.86%

+28.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.12%

-66.20%

+29.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.54%

-17.29%

-6.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.98%

-32.71%

+18.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.67%

5.53%

+5.14%

Volatility

FNV vs. BIB - Volatility Comparison

Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) and ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology (BIB) have volatilities of 13.78% and 13.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNVBIBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.78%

13.56%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.94%

31.65%

-0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.78%

40.43%

-3.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.54%

43.60%

-13.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.22%

46.39%

-16.17%

Dividends

FNV vs. BIB - Dividend Comparison

FNV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, more than BIB's 0.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIB
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology
0.55%0.77%1.69%0.07%0.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNV
Franco-Nevada Corporation
0.77%0.73%1.22%1.23%0.94%1.10%0.82%0.96%1.35%1.14%1.46%1.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNV and BIB have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNV has higher volatility (13.78%) compared to BIB (13.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNV dropped -58.76% vs BIB's -67.24%.

BIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNV and BIB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer