PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNSTX vs. RESGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNSTX vs. RESGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Infrastructure Fund (FNSTX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNSTX achieves a 10.08% return, which is significantly lower than RESGX's 27.79% return.


FNSTX

1D
1.93%
1M
-2.07%
YTD
10.08%
6M
9.33%
1Y
26.54%
3Y*
18.80%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*

RESGX

1D
2.80%
1M
10.96%
YTD
27.79%
6M
28.15%
1Y
44.13%
3Y*
20.42%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*
13.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNSTX vs. RESGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FNSTX
Fidelity Infrastructure Fund
10.08%27.42%14.43%8.44%-7.59%7.58%12.80%5.49%
RESGX
Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio
27.79%10.30%11.40%15.59%-14.71%26.58%9.57%5.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FNSTX and RESGX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2019

0.68

The correlation between FNSTX and RESGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNSTX vs. RESGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNSTX
FNSTX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FNSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FNSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

RESGX
RESGX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
RESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
RESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
RESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
RESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNSTX vs. RESGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Infrastructure Fund (FNSTX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNSTXRESGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.56

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

5.89

-2.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.01

21.39

-10.37

FNSTX vs. RESGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNSTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is lower than the RESGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNSTX and RESGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNSTXRESGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

3.21

-1.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.61

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.72

-0.09

Drawdowns

FNSTX vs. RESGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNSTX drawdown since its inception was -35.82%, smaller than the maximum RESGX drawdown of -37.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNSTX and RESGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNSTXRESGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.82%

-37.80%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.43%

-7.84%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.63%

-20.50%

+6.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.97%

-23.58%

+1.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.84%

0.00%

-2.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.17%

-5.00%

-0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

2.15%

+0.34%

Volatility

FNSTX vs. RESGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Infrastructure Fund (FNSTX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX) have volatilities of 5.45% and 5.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNSTXRESGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.45%

5.45%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.63%

11.00%

+1.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.51%

14.41%

+1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.15%

17.26%

-2.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.77%

18.71%

+0.06%

FNSTX vs. RESGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNSTX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than RESGX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNSTX vs. RESGX - Dividend Comparison

FNSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, less than RESGX's 6.52% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FNSTX
Fidelity Infrastructure Fund
3.80%4.16%1.59%1.85%1.35%0.63%0.80%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RESGX
Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio
6.52%8.24%13.38%9.08%8.17%9.98%0.82%1.90%5.09%0.94%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNSTX and RESGX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RESGX has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to FNSTX (5.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNSTX dropped -35.82% vs RESGX's -37.80%.

RESGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNSTX and RESGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer