PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNSTX vs. MSEFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNSTX vs. MSEFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Infrastructure Fund (FNSTX) and iMGP Equity Fund (MSEFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNSTX achieves a 5.53% return, which is significantly higher than MSEFX's 1.53% return.


FNSTX

1D
2.14%
1M
-3.30%
6M
2.35%
YTD
5.53%
1Y
12.66%
3Y*
15.95%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.63%

MSEFX

1D
0.59%
1M
0.08%
6M
2.05%
YTD
1.53%
1Y
5.93%
3Y*
3.87%
5Y*
-0.46%
10Y*
7.28%
ALL TIME*
7.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FNSTX vs. MSEFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FNSTX
Fidelity Infrastructure Fund
5.53%27.42%14.43%8.44%-7.59%7.58%12.80%5.49%
MSEFX
iMGP Equity Fund
1.53%5.15%3.29%17.30%-25.22%18.27%19.49%5.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FNSTX and MSEFX is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2019

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between FNSTX and MSEFX has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNSTX vs. MSEFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNSTX
FNSTX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FNSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FNSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

MSEFX
MSEFX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
MSEFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSEFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSEFX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
MSEFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSEFX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNSTX vs. MSEFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Infrastructure Fund (FNSTX) and iMGP Equity Fund (MSEFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNSTXMSEFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.06

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

0.34

+1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.03

1.10

+2.93

FNSTX vs. MSEFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNSTX Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is higher than the MSEFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNSTX and MSEFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNSTX vs. MSEFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNSTX drawdown since its inception was -35.82%, smaller than the maximum MSEFX drawdown of -61.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNSTX and MSEFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNSTXMSEFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.82%

-61.12%

+25.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.81%

-10.52%

+1.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.94%

-14.30%

+3.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.97%

-36.93%

+14.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.86%

-6.91%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.14%

-10.61%

+5.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

3.23%

-0.20%

Volatility

FNSTX vs. MSEFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Infrastructure Fund (FNSTX) has a higher volatility of 5.37% compared to iMGP Equity Fund (MSEFX) at 2.97%. This indicates that FNSTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSEFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNSTXMSEFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.37%

2.97%

+2.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.52%

9.29%

+4.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.87%

11.68%

+5.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.35%

15.97%

-0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.76%

17.75%

+1.01%

FNSTX vs. MSEFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNSTX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than MSEFX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNSTX vs. MSEFX - Dividend Comparison

FNSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, more than MSEFX's 3.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNSTX
Fidelity Infrastructure Fund
3.79%4.16%1.59%1.85%1.35%0.63%0.80%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSEFX
iMGP Equity Fund
3.35%3.40%7.44%4.08%31.07%16.28%12.45%9.07%14.47%7.93%5.87%9.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNSTX and MSEFX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNSTX has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to MSEFX (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNSTX dropped -35.82% vs MSEFX's -61.12%.

FNSTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNSTX and MSEFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer