PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNSHX vs. MXBSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNSHX vs. MXBSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Income Fund Class K (FNSHX) and Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund (MXBSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNSHX achieves a 4.71% return, which is significantly lower than MXBSX's 10.07% return.


FNSHX

1D
-0.25%
1M
1.12%
YTD
4.71%
6M
5.11%
1Y
10.82%
3Y*
8.01%
5Y*
3.17%
10Y*

MXBSX

1D
-0.57%
1M
2.81%
YTD
10.07%
6M
10.63%
1Y
22.71%
3Y*
16.44%
5Y*
7.95%
10Y*
10.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNSHX vs. MXBSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNSHX
Fidelity Freedom Income Fund Class K
4.71%10.35%4.40%8.26%-11.31%3.16%9.01%10.74%-1.86%0.09%
MXBSX
Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund
10.07%17.70%11.16%17.79%-16.61%16.82%13.96%26.31%-10.30%7.24%

Correlation

The correlation between FNSHX and MXBSX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017

0.61

The correlation between FNSHX and MXBSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (all time) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNSHX vs. MXBSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNSHX
FNSHX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FNSHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNSHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNSHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FNSHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNSHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

MXBSX
MXBSX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
MXBSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MXBSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MXBSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
MXBSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
MXBSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNSHX vs. MXBSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Income Fund Class K (FNSHX) and Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund (MXBSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNSHXMXBSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.35

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

2.63

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.60

10.93

+2.67

FNSHX vs. MXBSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNSHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the MXBSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNSHX and MXBSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNSHXMXBSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

1.88

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.50

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.64

+0.19

Drawdowns

FNSHX vs. MXBSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNSHX drawdown since its inception was -15.87%, smaller than the maximum MXBSX drawdown of -31.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNSHX and MXBSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNSHXMXBSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.87%

-31.88%

+16.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.68%

-8.80%

+5.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.89%

-14.76%

+9.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.87%

-29.68%

+13.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-0.57%

+0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.04%

-5.94%

+2.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

2.11%

-1.27%

Volatility

FNSHX vs. MXBSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom Income Fund Class K (FNSHX) is 1.94%, while Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund (MXBSX) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that FNSHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MXBSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNSHXMXBSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.94%

3.33%

-1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.92%

8.93%

-5.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.62%

12.32%

-7.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.35%

15.89%

-10.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.84%

16.37%

-11.53%

FNSHX vs. MXBSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNSHX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than MXBSX's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNSHX vs. MXBSX - Dividend Comparison

FNSHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, less than MXBSX's 4.79% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNSHX
Fidelity Freedom Income Fund Class K
3.01%3.21%3.19%2.98%5.94%6.17%4.43%3.74%5.22%0.00%
MXBSX
Great-West Lifetime 2050 Fund
4.79%5.27%7.38%5.63%10.66%11.14%6.57%9.46%8.18%3.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNSHX and MXBSX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MXBSX has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to FNSHX (1.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNSHX dropped -15.87% vs MXBSX's -31.88%.

FNSHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNSHX and MXBSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer