PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNOV vs. NAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FNOV vs. NAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November (FNOV) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FNOV vs. NAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FNOV
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November
-2.62%14.66%12.48%19.69%-8.88%10.77%34.22%
NAPR
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April
1.71%6.56%13.29%30.60%-12.13%9.09%15.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNOV achieves a -2.62% return, which is significantly lower than NAPR's 1.71% return.


FNOV

1D
2.01%
1M
-3.13%
YTD
-2.62%
6M
0.96%
1Y
14.41%
3Y*
12.40%
5Y*
7.79%
10Y*

NAPR

1D
0.13%
1M
0.66%
YTD
1.71%
6M
3.74%
1Y
14.51%
3Y*
11.94%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FNOV vs. NAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNOV has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than NAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FNOV vs. NAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNOV
FNOV Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

NAPR
NAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
NAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
NAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNOV vs. NAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November (FNOV) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNOVNAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.15

1.51

-0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.75

2.43

-0.68

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.52

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

1.93

-0.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.30

14.15

-4.85

FNOV vs. NAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNOV Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the NAPR Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNOV and NAPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNOVNAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

1.51

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.77

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.95

-0.29

Correlation

The correlation between FNOV and NAPR is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FNOV vs. NAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither FNOV nor NAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FNOV vs. NAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNOV drawdown since its inception was -24.41%, which is greater than NAPR's maximum drawdown of -16.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNOV and NAPR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FNOVNAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.41%

-16.53%

-7.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.69%

-7.53%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.87%

-16.53%

+0.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.81%

0.00%

-3.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.99%

-2.34%

-0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

1.03%

+0.58%

Volatility

FNOV vs. NAPR - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - November (FNOV) has a higher volatility of 3.79% compared to Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) at 0.65%. This indicates that FNOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FNOVNAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

0.65%

+3.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.98%

2.23%

+3.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.55%

9.65%

+2.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.46%

11.30%

+0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.82%

10.71%

+3.11%