PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNMAX vs. DCARX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNMAX vs. DCARX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor New York Municipal Income Fund Class A (FNMAX) and DFA California Municipal Real Return Portfolio (DCARX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNMAX achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly lower than DCARX's 2.03% return.


FNMAX

1D
0.24%
1M
0.79%
YTD
1.68%
6M
2.08%
1Y
7.78%
3Y*
3.70%
5Y*
0.40%
10Y*
1.62%

DCARX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.19%
YTD
2.03%
6M
2.07%
1Y
3.47%
3Y*
3.27%
5Y*
2.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNMAX vs. DCARX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNMAX
Fidelity Advisor New York Municipal Income Fund Class A
1.68%4.60%0.58%6.93%-11.28%2.13%3.74%7.47%-0.03%1.55%
DCARX
DFA California Municipal Real Return Portfolio
2.03%2.64%3.16%2.63%-1.06%6.21%2.35%5.08%-0.46%1.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FNMAX and DCARX is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2017

0.25

The correlation between FNMAX and DCARX shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNMAX vs. DCARX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNMAX
FNMAX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FNMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FNMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

DCARX
DCARX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
DCARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCARX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
DCARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCARX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNMAX vs. DCARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor New York Municipal Income Fund Class A (FNMAX) and DFA California Municipal Real Return Portfolio (DCARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNMAXDCARXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.95

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

7.25

-4.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.84

20.39

-12.55

FNMAX vs. DCARX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNMAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the DCARX Sharpe Ratio of 3.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNMAX and DCARX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNMAXDCARXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

3.27

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

1.14

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.96

-0.39

Drawdowns

FNMAX vs. DCARX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNMAX drawdown since its inception was -17.16%, which is greater than DCARX's maximum drawdown of -12.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNMAX and DCARX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNMAXDCARXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.16%

-12.27%

-4.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.31%

-0.47%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.53%

-1.39%

-5.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.33%

-4.79%

-11.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

0.00%

-0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.19%

-0.74%

-2.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

0.17%

+0.81%

Volatility

FNMAX vs. DCARX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor New York Municipal Income Fund Class A (FNMAX) has a higher volatility of 1.27% compared to DFA California Municipal Real Return Portfolio (DCARX) at 0.44%. This indicates that FNMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DCARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNMAXDCARXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.27%

0.44%

+0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.35%

0.86%

+1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.01%

1.04%

+1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.31%

2.24%

+2.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.25%

2.91%

+1.34%

FNMAX vs. DCARX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNMAX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than DCARX's 0.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNMAX vs. DCARX - Dividend Comparison

FNMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than DCARX's 3.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DCARX
DFA California Municipal Real Return Portfolio
3.22%3.11%3.52%1.84%0.90%0.78%1.12%1.43%1.27%0.09%0.00%0.00%
FNMAX
Fidelity Advisor New York Municipal Income Fund Class A
2.62%3.38%1.87%2.12%1.57%2.27%2.46%2.55%2.49%3.31%3.88%3.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNMAX and DCARX have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNMAX has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to DCARX (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNMAX dropped -17.16% vs DCARX's -12.27%.

DCARX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNMAX and DCARX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer