PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNMA vs. LIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FNMA vs. LIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) and Linde plc (LIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNMA achieves a -39.52% return, which is significantly lower than LIN's 23.59% return.


FNMA

1D
2.72%
1M
-16.90%
YTD
-39.52%
6M
-39.35%
1Y
-32.56%
3Y*
145.80%
5Y*
22.01%
10Y*
12.27%

LIN

1D
1.58%
1M
3.78%
YTD
23.59%
6M
26.61%
1Y
13.87%
3Y*
13.38%
5Y*
13.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNMA vs. LIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FNMA
Federal National Mortgage Association
-39.52%227.13%206.54%202.77%-56.90%-65.69%-23.40%194.34%-26.39%
LIN
Linde plc
23.59%3.22%3.18%27.66%-4.39%33.39%25.88%39.04%-5.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FNMA and LIN is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2018

0.14

The correlation between FNMA and LIN shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FNMA:

$38.25B

LIN:

$244.15B

EPS

FNMA:

$2.77

LIN:

$15.16

PE Ratio

FNMA:

2.34

LIN:

34.54

PEG Ratio

FNMA:

0.00

LIN:

1.72

PS Ratio

FNMA:

0.24

LIN:

7.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

FNMA:

$161.03B

LIN:

$34.66B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FNMA:

$117.99B

LIN:

$15.94B

EBITDA (TTM)

FNMA:

$111.39B

LIN:

$12.31B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNMA vs. LIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNMA
FNMA Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FNMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNMA Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FNMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNMA Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

LIN
LIN Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
LIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIN Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
LIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIN Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNMA vs. LIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) and Linde plc (LIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNMALINDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.13

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

0.67

-1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.91

1.89

-2.80

FNMA vs. LIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNMA Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is lower than the LIN Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNMA and LIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNMA vs. LIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNMA drawdown since its inception was -99.74%, which is greater than LIN's maximum drawdown of -32.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNMA and LIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNMALINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.74%

-32.59%

-67.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.76%

-19.18%

-50.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.76%

-19.18%

-50.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.50%

-22.82%

-61.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.14%

0.00%

-91.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.18%

-5.41%

-40.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.56%

6.79%

+30.77%

Volatility

FNMA vs. LIN - Volatility Comparison

Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) has a higher volatility of 18.31% compared to Linde plc (LIN) at 5.57%. This indicates that FNMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNMALINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.31%

5.57%

+12.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

66.11%

13.53%

+52.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

93.38%

17.24%

+76.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

91.93%

20.79%

+71.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

81.90%

24.08%

+57.82%

Dividends

FNMA vs. LIN - Dividend Comparison

FNMA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FNMA
Federal National Mortgage Association
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LIN
Linde plc
1.18%1.41%1.33%1.24%1.43%1.22%1.46%1.64%0.53%

Financials

FNMA vs. LIN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Federal National Mortgage Association and Linde plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
40.22B
8.78B
(FNMA) Total Revenue
(LIN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FNMA vs. LIN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Federal National Mortgage Association and Linde plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
48.5%
Portfolio components
FNMA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federal National Mortgage Association reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 40.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LIN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Linde plc reported a gross profit of 4.26B and revenue of 8.78B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.5%.

FNMA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federal National Mortgage Association reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 40.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

LIN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Linde plc reported an operating income of 3.26B and revenue of 8.78B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.2%.

FNMA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federal National Mortgage Association reported a net income of 5.61B and revenue of 40.22B, resulting in a net margin of 13.9%.

LIN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Linde plc reported a net income of 1.86B and revenue of 8.78B, resulting in a net margin of 21.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FNMA and LIN have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNMA has higher volatility (18.31%) compared to LIN (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNMA dropped -99.74% vs LIN's -32.59%.

LIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNMA and LIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer