PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNKFX vs. ATGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNKFX vs. ATGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock K6 Fund (FNKFX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FNKFX

1D
1.64%
1M
3.92%
YTD
17.30%
6M
17.71%
1Y
30.45%
3Y*
20.76%
5Y*
11.69%
10Y*

ATGAX

1D
1.15%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNKFX vs. ATGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FNKFX and ATGAX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNKFX vs. ATGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNKFX
FNKFX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FNKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FNKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

ATGAX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNKFX vs. ATGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock K6 Fund (FNKFX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNKFXATGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.28

FNKFX vs. ATGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNKFXATGAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

58.33

-57.67

Drawdowns

FNKFX vs. ATGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNKFX drawdown since its inception was -41.25%, which is greater than ATGAX's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNKFX and ATGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNKFXATGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.25%

0.00%

-41.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.98%

0.00%

-4.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

Volatility

FNKFX vs. ATGAX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNKFXATGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.87%

9.26%

+6.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.86%

9.26%

+9.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.97%

9.26%

+12.71%

FNKFX vs. ATGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNKFX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than ATGAX's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNKFX vs. ATGAX - Dividend Comparison

FNKFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, while ATGAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
ATGAX
Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNKFX
Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock K6 Fund
0.50%0.59%12.35%0.99%2.91%4.03%1.45%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNKFX and ATGAX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNKFX and ATGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer