PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNILX vs. FSUVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNILX vs. FSUVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund (FSUVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNILX achieves a 9.63% return, which is significantly higher than FSUVX's 3.46% return.


FNILX

1D
-0.37%
1M
0.34%
YTD
9.63%
6M
8.65%
1Y
25.14%
3Y*
21.66%
5Y*
13.32%
10Y*

FSUVX

1D
-0.59%
1M
-2.76%
YTD
3.46%
6M
2.97%
1Y
10.40%
3Y*
13.42%
5Y*
9.18%
10Y*
11.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNILX vs. FSUVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
9.63%17.81%25.47%27.45%-19.37%26.67%21.13%31.79%-13.60%
FSUVX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund
3.46%11.03%17.40%14.80%-10.93%21.51%9.86%27.73%-7.11%

Correlation

The correlation between FNILX and FSUVX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2018

0.88

The correlation between FNILX and FSUVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNILX vs. FSUVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNILX
FNILX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FNILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNILX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FNILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNILX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

FSUVX
FSUVX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
FSUVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSUVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSUVX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FSUVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSUVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNILX vs. FSUVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund (FSUVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNILXFSUVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.24

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

1.61

+1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.99

6.69

+6.30

FNILX vs. FSUVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNILX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the FSUVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNILX and FSUVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNILX vs. FSUVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNILX drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, roughly equal to the maximum FSUVX drawdown of -32.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNILX and FSUVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNILXFSUVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.76%

-32.41%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.01%

-7.28%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.08%

-11.55%

-7.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.40%

-19.48%

-5.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.73%

-2.76%

+1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.35%

-3.27%

-2.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

1.74%

+0.29%

Volatility

FNILX vs. FSUVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX) has a higher volatility of 4.82% compared to Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund (FSUVX) at 2.71%. This indicates that FNILX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSUVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNILXFSUVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.82%

2.71%

+2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.90%

6.54%

+3.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.61%

8.59%

+4.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

12.97%

+4.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.04%

15.19%

+4.85%

FNILX vs. FSUVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNILX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FSUVX's 0.11% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FNILX vs. FSUVX - Dividend Comparison

FNILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than FSUVX's 4.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
0.92%1.01%1.09%1.34%1.53%0.95%1.20%1.17%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FSUVX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund
4.30%4.45%2.25%1.74%4.12%3.52%1.31%3.80%2.63%2.94%2.23%1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNILX and FSUVX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNILX has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to FSUVX (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNILX dropped -33.76% vs FSUVX's -32.41%.

FNILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNILX and FSUVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer