FNGG vs. SPXS
FNGG (Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares) and SPXS (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - FNGG is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index (2x Leveraged), while SPXS is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FNGG returned 46.89%/yr vs -38.58%/yr for SPXS. Their -0.82 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. FNGG charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for SPXS.
Performance
FNGG vs. SPXS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNGG achieves a 11.69% return, which is significantly higher than SPXS's -23.70% return.
FNGG
- 1D
- 3.83%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 20.01%
- YTD
- 11.69%
- 1Y
- 22.57%
- 3Y*
- 46.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.19%
SPXS
- 1D
- -2.06%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- 6M
- -20.89%
- YTD
- -23.70%
- 1Y
- -41.03%
- 3Y*
- -38.58%
- 5Y*
- -32.70%
- 10Y*
- -41.22%
- ALL TIME*
- -44.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $659.98K | $756.57K | $1.71M | |
| $303.07M | $277.28M | $339.89M |
FNGG vs. SPXS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGG Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares | 11.69% | 27.21% | 98.76% | 204.23% | -87.15% | -4.05% |
SPXS Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares | -23.70% | -41.53% | -42.84% | -45.97% | 36.14% | -26.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNGG and SPXS is -0.81, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2021 | -0.82 |
The correlation between FNGG and SPXS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.82 to -0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNGG vs. SPXS — Risk / Return Rank
FNGG
SPXS
FNGG vs. SPXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNGG | SPXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.84 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | -0.88 | +1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.90 | -1.43 | +2.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNGG vs. SPXS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNGG drawdown since its inception was -91.33%, smaller than the maximum SPXS drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGG and SPXS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNGG | SPXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.33% | -100.00% | +8.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.01% | -43.64% | +0.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.03% | -84.13% | +37.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -90.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.39% | -100.00% | +82.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.74% | -96.31% | +41.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.59% | 26.70% | -9.11% |
Volatility
FNGG vs. SPXS - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG) has a higher volatility of 12.01% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS) at 10.76%. This indicates that FNGG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNGG | SPXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.01% | 10.76% | +1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.72% | 30.49% | +5.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.43% | 38.59% | +5.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.29% | 50.77% | +16.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.29% | 53.58% | +13.71% |
FNGG vs. SPXS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNGG has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than SPXS's 1.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNGG vs. SPXS - Dividend Comparison
FNGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.66%, more than SPXS's 4.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGG Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares | 10.66% | 11.89% | 0.79% | 0.88% | 0.00% | 4.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPXS Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares | 4.45% | 4.93% | 6.18% | 5.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.51% | 1.74% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNGG and SPXS have a correlation of -0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNGG has higher volatility (12.01%) compared to SPXS (10.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNGG dropped -91.33% vs SPXS's -100.00%.
On 3-year performance, FNGG leads with 46.89% vs -38.58% for SPXS. On fees, FNGG is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, SPXS has been the lower-risk option at 10.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FNGG has performed better with a 46.89% return vs -38.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FNGG is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for SPXS.
FNGG has the higher dividend yield at 10.66%, compared with 4.45% for SPXS.
FNGG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SPXS is Inverse Equities. FNGG tracks NYSE FANG+ Index (2x Leveraged), while SPXS tracks S&P 500 Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 0.97% for FNGG and 1.08% for SPXS.
FNGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.36 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNGG and SPXS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer