FNGG vs. NTSD
FNGG (Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. FNGG is passively managed, while NTSD is actively managed. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FNGG charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.
Performance
FNGG vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FNGG
- 1D
- 3.83%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 20.01%
- YTD
- 11.69%
- 1Y
- 22.57%
- 3Y*
- 46.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.19%
NTSD
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $659.98K | $756.57K | $1.71M | |
| $185.69K | $179.97K | $305.82K |
FNGG vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FNGG Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares | 33.88% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 19.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNGG and NTSD is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNGG vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank
FNGG
NTSD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FNGG vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares (FNGG) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNGG | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.90 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNGG vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNGG drawdown since its inception was -91.33%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGG and NTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNGG | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.33% | -5.58% | -85.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.39% | -0.75% | -16.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.74% | -1.24% | -53.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.59% | — | — |
Volatility
FNGG vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNGG | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.01% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.72% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.43% | 23.15% | +21.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.29% | 23.15% | +44.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.29% | 23.15% | +44.14% |
FNGG vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNGG has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNGG vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison
FNGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.66%, more than NTSD's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNGG Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X Shares | 10.66% | 11.89% | 0.79% | 0.88% | 0.00% | 4.99% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNGG and NTSD have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for FNGG.
FNGG has the higher dividend yield at 10.66%, compared with 0.14% for NTSD.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for FNGG and 0.35% for NTSD.
Find the right allocation for FNGG and NTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer