PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNCW.L vs. UDVD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNCW.L vs. UDVD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF (FNCW.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (UDVD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FNCW.L is traded in GBP, while UDVD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the UDVD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNCW.L achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly lower than UDVD.L's 7.43% return.


FNCW.L

1D
1.91%
1M
2.90%
YTD
0.43%
6M
3.68%
1Y
15.52%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
10Y*

UDVD.L

1D
0.11%
1M
1.72%
YTD
7.43%
6M
7.06%
1Y
13.99%
3Y*
6.98%
5Y*
6.80%
10Y*
9.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNCW.L vs. UDVD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FNCW.L
SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF
0.43%20.39%28.76%9.92%-0.09%
UDVD.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
7.43%0.84%9.52%-3.04%7.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FNCW.L and UDVD.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between FNCW.L and UDVD.L has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FNCW.L vs. UDVD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNCW.L
UDVD.L

Financial Services

98.2%
11.5%

Technology

1.3%
8.9%

Industrials

0.2%
17.5%

Real Estate

0.1%
4.6%

Energy

0.1%
4.5%

Healthcare

0.1%
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%
5.2%

Utilities

0.1%
14.8%

Basic Materials

-

6.4%

Communication Services

-

3.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

17.0%

Financial Services

FNCW.L
98.2%
UDVD.L
11.5%

Technology

FNCW.L
1.3%
UDVD.L
8.9%

Industrials

FNCW.L
0.2%
UDVD.L
17.5%

Real Estate

FNCW.L
0.1%
UDVD.L
4.6%

Energy

FNCW.L
0.1%
UDVD.L
4.5%

Healthcare

FNCW.L
0.1%
UDVD.L
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FNCW.L
0.1%
UDVD.L
5.2%

Utilities

FNCW.L
0.1%
UDVD.L
14.8%

Basic Materials

FNCW.L

-

UDVD.L
6.4%

Communication Services

FNCW.L

-

UDVD.L
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

FNCW.L

-

UDVD.L
17.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNCW.L vs. UDVD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNCW.L
FNCW.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FNCW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNCW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNCW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FNCW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNCW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

UDVD.L
UDVD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
UDVD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNCW.L vs. UDVD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF (FNCW.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (UDVD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNCW.LUDVD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.22

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

2.15

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.15

5.62

-0.46

FNCW.L vs. UDVD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNCW.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the UDVD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNCW.L and UDVD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNCW.LUDVD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

1.29

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.77

+0.15

Drawdowns

FNCW.L vs. UDVD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNCW.L drawdown since its inception was -16.31%, smaller than the maximum UDVD.L drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNCW.L and UDVD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNCW.LUDVD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.31%

-28.19%

+11.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.55%

-6.47%

-3.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.31%

-16.57%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-3.26%

+2.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.76%

-4.22%

+0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

2.48%

+0.52%

Volatility

FNCW.L vs. UDVD.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF (FNCW.L) has a higher volatility of 3.46% compared to SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (UDVD.L) at 3.00%. This indicates that FNCW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UDVD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNCW.LUDVD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

3.00%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.59%

8.23%

+1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.41%

10.81%

+1.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.02%

13.76%

+1.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.02%

16.06%

-1.04%

FNCW.L vs. UDVD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNCW.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than UDVD.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNCW.L vs. UDVD.L - Dividend Comparison

FNCW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UDVD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNCW.L
SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UDVD.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
2.05%2.17%2.03%2.24%2.13%2.15%2.36%2.01%2.27%1.78%1.83%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNCW.L and UDVD.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FNCW.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FNCW.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for UDVD.L.

FNCW.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while UDVD.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. FNCW.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while UDVD.L tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FNCW.L and 0.35% for UDVD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNCW.L and UDVD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer