PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNCW.L vs. REL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNCW.L vs. REL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF (FNCW.L) and RELX PLC (REL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FNCW.L is traded in GBP, while REL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the REL.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNCW.L achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly higher than REL.L's -12.88% return.


FNCW.L

1D
1.91%
1M
2.90%
YTD
0.43%
6M
3.68%
1Y
15.52%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
10Y*

REL.L

1D
6.03%
1M
-1.60%
YTD
-12.88%
6M
-13.31%
1Y
-34.05%
3Y*
2.02%
5Y*
9.14%
10Y*
9.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNCW.L vs. REL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FNCW.L
SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF
0.43%20.39%28.76%9.92%-0.09%
REL.L
RELX PLC
-12.88%-15.41%18.77%38.84%-2.94%

Correlation

The correlation between FNCW.L and REL.L is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNCW.L vs. REL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNCW.L
FNCW.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FNCW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNCW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNCW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FNCW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNCW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

REL.L
REL.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
REL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
REL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
REL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
REL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNCW.L vs. REL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF (FNCW.L) and RELX PLC (REL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNCW.LREL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

0.80

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

-0.68

+2.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.15

-1.32

+6.47

FNCW.L vs. REL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNCW.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the REL.L Sharpe Ratio of -1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNCW.L and REL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNCW.LREL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

-1.07

+2.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.39

+0.53

Drawdowns

FNCW.L vs. REL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNCW.L drawdown since its inception was -16.31%, smaller than the maximum REL.L drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNCW.L and REL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNCW.LREL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.31%

-50.99%

+34.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.55%

-49.56%

+40.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.31%

-50.99%

+34.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-35.93%

+34.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.76%

-11.95%

+8.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

25.80%

-22.80%

Volatility

FNCW.L vs. REL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF (FNCW.L) is 3.46%, while RELX PLC (REL.L) has a volatility of 11.48%. This indicates that FNCW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNCW.LREL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

11.48%

-8.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.59%

28.80%

-19.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.41%

31.59%

-19.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.02%

21.61%

-6.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.02%

21.57%

-6.55%

Dividends

FNCW.L vs. REL.L - Dividend Comparison

FNCW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while REL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNCW.L
SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
REL.L
RELX PLC
2.61%2.13%1.65%1.80%2.24%1.99%2.55%2.27%2.48%2.15%2.25%2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


FNCW.L and REL.L have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNCW.L and REL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer