PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNCL.L vs. X7PP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNCL.L vs. X7PP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR® MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF (FNCL.L) and Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FNCL.L is traded in EUR, while X7PP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the X7PP.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNCL.L achieves a 2.99% return, which is significantly lower than X7PP.L's 5.75% return. Over the past 10 years, FNCL.L has underperformed X7PP.L with an annualized return of 12.19%, while X7PP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.81% annualized return.


FNCL.L

1D
-1.73%
1M
0.98%
YTD
2.99%
6M
10.06%
1Y
21.33%
3Y*
28.17%
5Y*
19.22%
10Y*
12.19%

X7PP.L

1D
-1.40%
1M
3.53%
YTD
5.75%
6M
13.30%
1Y
37.96%
3Y*
42.10%
5Y*
27.18%
10Y*
13.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNCL.L vs. X7PP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNCL.L
SPDR® MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF
2.99%47.03%25.92%21.19%-1.89%28.62%-15.42%22.23%-18.97%12.71%
X7PP.L
Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF
5.75%77.98%33.20%25.89%0.57%37.56%-22.93%15.22%-26.37%10.89%

Correlation

The correlation between FNCL.L and X7PP.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2014

0.93

The correlation between FNCL.L and X7PP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNCL.L vs. X7PP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNCL.L
X7PP.L

Financial Services

98.1%
100.0%

Technology

1.2%

-

Industrials

0.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

FNCL.L
98.1%
X7PP.L
100.0%

Technology

FNCL.L
1.2%
X7PP.L

-

Industrials

FNCL.L
0.7%
X7PP.L

-

Basic Materials

FNCL.L

-

X7PP.L

-

Communication Services

FNCL.L

-

X7PP.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

FNCL.L

-

X7PP.L

-

Consumer Defensive

FNCL.L

-

X7PP.L

-

Energy

FNCL.L

-

X7PP.L

-

Healthcare

FNCL.L

-

X7PP.L

-

Real Estate

FNCL.L

-

X7PP.L

-

Utilities

FNCL.L

-

X7PP.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNCL.L vs. X7PP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNCL.L
FNCL.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FNCL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNCL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNCL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FNCL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNCL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

X7PP.L
X7PP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
X7PP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
X7PP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNCL.L vs. X7PP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR® MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF (FNCL.L) and Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNCL.LX7PP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.29

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

2.31

-0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.89

7.52

-1.63

FNCL.L vs. X7PP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNCL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is comparable to the X7PP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNCL.L and X7PP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNCL.LX7PP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

1.71

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

1.15

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.54

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.37

+0.08

Drawdowns

FNCL.L vs. X7PP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNCL.L drawdown since its inception was -45.18%, smaller than the maximum X7PP.L drawdown of -60.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNCL.L and X7PP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNCL.LX7PP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.18%

-60.65%

+15.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.18%

-16.37%

+4.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.84%

-20.20%

+3.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.05%

-29.59%

+6.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.18%

-56.52%

+11.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.27%

-2.28%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.39%

-20.51%

+10.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

5.03%

-1.42%

Volatility

FNCL.L vs. X7PP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR® MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF (FNCL.L) is 5.84%, while Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) has a volatility of 6.69%. This indicates that FNCL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than X7PP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNCL.LX7PP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.84%

6.69%

-0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.40%

17.84%

-3.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.67%

22.15%

-4.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.77%

23.61%

-4.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.99%

25.62%

-4.63%

FNCL.L vs. X7PP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNCL.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than X7PP.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FNCL.L vs. X7PP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FNCL.L nor X7PP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FNCL.L and X7PP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, FNCL.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FNCL.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for X7PP.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Financials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FNCL.L and 0.20% for X7PP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNCL.L and X7PP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer