PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNCL.L vs. S7XP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNCL.L vs. S7XP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR® MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF (FNCL.L) and Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF (S7XP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FNCL.L is traded in EUR, while S7XP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the S7XP.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNCL.L achieves a 2.99% return, which is significantly lower than S7XP.L's 4.48% return. Over the past 10 years, FNCL.L has underperformed S7XP.L with an annualized return of 12.19%, while S7XP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.36% annualized return.


FNCL.L

1D
-1.73%
1M
0.98%
YTD
2.99%
6M
10.06%
1Y
21.33%
3Y*
28.17%
5Y*
19.22%
10Y*
12.19%

S7XP.L

1D
-1.59%
1M
4.02%
YTD
4.48%
6M
12.35%
1Y
36.21%
3Y*
43.37%
5Y*
27.81%
10Y*
14.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNCL.L vs. S7XP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNCL.L
SPDR® MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF
2.99%47.03%25.92%21.19%-1.89%28.62%-15.42%22.23%-18.97%12.71%
S7XP.L
Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF
4.48%84.60%31.44%28.89%1.21%38.48%-23.10%17.69%-31.77%14.32%

Correlation

The correlation between FNCL.L and S7XP.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2014

0.89

The correlation between FNCL.L and S7XP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNCL.L vs. S7XP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNCL.L
S7XP.L

Financial Services

98.1%
100.0%

Technology

1.2%

-

Industrials

0.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

FNCL.L
98.1%
S7XP.L
100.0%

Technology

FNCL.L
1.2%
S7XP.L

-

Industrials

FNCL.L
0.7%
S7XP.L

-

Basic Materials

FNCL.L

-

S7XP.L

-

Communication Services

FNCL.L

-

S7XP.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

FNCL.L

-

S7XP.L

-

Consumer Defensive

FNCL.L

-

S7XP.L

-

Energy

FNCL.L

-

S7XP.L

-

Healthcare

FNCL.L

-

S7XP.L

-

Real Estate

FNCL.L

-

S7XP.L

-

Utilities

FNCL.L

-

S7XP.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNCL.L vs. S7XP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNCL.L
FNCL.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FNCL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNCL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNCL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FNCL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNCL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

S7XP.L
S7XP.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
S7XP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
S7XP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
S7XP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
S7XP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
S7XP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNCL.L vs. S7XP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR® MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF (FNCL.L) and Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF (S7XP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNCL.LS7XP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.26

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

2.06

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.89

6.55

-0.66

FNCL.L vs. S7XP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNCL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is comparable to the S7XP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNCL.L and S7XP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNCL.LS7XP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

1.53

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

1.08

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.50

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.32

+0.13

Drawdowns

FNCL.L vs. S7XP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNCL.L drawdown since its inception was -45.18%, smaller than the maximum S7XP.L drawdown of -65.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNCL.L and S7XP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNCL.LS7XP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.18%

-65.27%

+20.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.18%

-17.52%

+5.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.84%

-20.24%

+3.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.05%

-35.36%

+12.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.18%

-62.95%

+17.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.27%

-2.80%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.39%

-22.63%

+12.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

5.51%

-1.90%

Volatility

FNCL.L vs. S7XP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR® MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF (FNCL.L) is 5.84%, while Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF (S7XP.L) has a volatility of 6.65%. This indicates that FNCL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than S7XP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNCL.LS7XP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.84%

6.65%

-0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.40%

18.56%

-4.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.67%

23.53%

-5.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.77%

25.72%

-6.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.99%

28.61%

-7.62%

FNCL.L vs. S7XP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNCL.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than S7XP.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNCL.L vs. S7XP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FNCL.L nor S7XP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FNCL.L and S7XP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, FNCL.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FNCL.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for S7XP.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Financials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FNCL.L and 0.30% for S7XP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNCL.L and S7XP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer