FNCL.L vs. BNKS.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FNCL.L (SPDR® MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF) and BNKS.L (iShares S&P U.S. Banks) are both Financials Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD, from State Street and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FNCL.L returned 19.37%/yr vs 5.74%/yr for BNKS.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FNCL.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BNKS.L.

Performance

FNCL.L vs. BNKS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR® MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF (FNCL.L) and iShares S&P U.S. Banks (BNKS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

FNCL.L is traded in EUR, while BNKS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BNKS.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNCL.L achieves a 3.63% return, which is significantly lower than BNKS.L's 4.79% return.

FNCL.L

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: 3.41%
• YTD: 3.63%
• 6M: 9.96%
• 1Y: 22.36%
• 3Y*: 28.76%
• 5Y*: 19.37%
• 10Y*: 12.23%

BNKS.L

• 1D: 3.35%
• 1M: 1.67%
• YTD: 4.79%
• 6M: 7.79%
• 1Y: 25.75%
• 3Y*: 22.94%
• 5Y*: 5.74%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNCL.L vs. BNKS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FNCL.L SPDR® MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF	3.63%	47.03%	25.92%	21.19%	-1.89%	28.62%	-15.42%	22.23%	-18.97%
BNKS.L iShares S&P U.S. Banks	4.79%	6.16%	37.03%	-6.62%	-13.75%	50.16%	-19.38%	39.12%	-22.53%

Correlation

The correlation between FNCL.L and BNKS.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2018	0.60

The correlation between FNCL.L and BNKS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (3 years) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FNCL.L vs. BNKS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNCL.L	BNKS.L
Financial Services	98.1%	100.0%
Technology	1.2%	-
Industrials	0.7%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FNCL.L vs. BNKS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNCL.L

FNCL.L Risk / Return Rank: 36
FNCL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
FNCL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
FNCL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 34
FNCL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
FNCL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 40

BNKS.L

BNKS.L Risk / Return Rank: 36
BNKS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
BNKS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
BNKS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 36
BNKS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
BNKS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNCL.L vs. BNKS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR® MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF (FNCL.L) and iShares S&P U.S. Banks (BNKS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNCL.L	BNKS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.26	1.21	+0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.82	1.71	+0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.21	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.83	1.69	+0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.17	4.71	+1.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNCL.L vs. BNKS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNCL.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the BNKS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNCL.L and BNKS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNCL.L	BNKS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.26	1.21	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.03	0.21	+0.82
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.20	+0.25

Drawdowns

FNCL.L vs. BNKS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNCL.L drawdown since its inception was -45.18%, smaller than the maximum BNKS.L drawdown of -49.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNCL.L and BNKS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNCL.L	BNKS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.18%	-49.77%	+4.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.18%	-15.20%	+3.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.84%	-32.17%	+15.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.05%	-48.32%	+25.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.18%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.65%	-3.91%	+2.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.38%	-16.56%	+6.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.61%	5.45%	-1.84%

Volatility

FNCL.L vs. BNKS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR® MSCI Europe Financials UCITS ETF (FNCL.L) is 5.55%, while iShares S&P U.S. Banks (BNKS.L) has a volatility of 6.09%. This indicates that FNCL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNKS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNCL.L	BNKS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.55%	6.09%	-0.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.40%	15.69%	-1.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.68%	21.25%	-3.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.77%	27.38%	-8.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.99%	31.36%	-10.37%

FNCL.L vs. BNKS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNCL.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than BNKS.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNCL.L vs. BNKS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FNCL.L nor BNKS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNCL.L and BNKS.L in my portfolio?

FNCL.L and BNKS.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FNCL.L or BNKS.L?

On fees, FNCL.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNCL.L or BNKS.L?

FNCL.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BNKS.L.

What is the main difference between FNCL.L and BNKS.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Financials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FNCL.L and 0.35% for BNKS.L.