FMSFX vs. FHPFX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FMSFX (Fidelity Mortgage Securities Fund) and FHPFX (Fidelity Series Investment Grade Securitized Fund) are both Total Bond Market funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FMSFX returned 0.14%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for FHPFX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FMSFX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FHPFX.

Performance

FMSFX vs. FHPFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Mortgage Securities Fund (FMSFX) and Fidelity Series Investment Grade Securitized Fund (FHPFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMSFX achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly lower than FHPFX's 0.71% return.

FMSFX

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.63%
• YTD: 0.66%
• 6M: 0.97%
• 1Y: 5.80%
• 3Y*: 4.25%
• 5Y*: 0.14%
• 10Y*: 1.25%

FHPFX

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 0.59%
• YTD: 0.71%
• 6M: 1.06%
• 1Y: 6.11%
• 3Y*: 4.69%
• 5Y*: 0.58%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMSFX vs. FHPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FMSFX Fidelity Mortgage Securities Fund	0.66%	8.29%	1.00%	4.91%	-12.61%	-1.20%	4.41%	6.43%	1.68%
FHPFX Fidelity Series Investment Grade Securitized Fund	0.71%	8.76%	1.81%	5.29%	-12.28%	-1.06%	4.84%	6.69%	1.41%

Correlation

The correlation between FMSFX and FHPFX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2018	0.97

The correlation between FMSFX and FHPFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FMSFX vs. FHPFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMSFX

FMSFX Risk / Return Rank: 34
FMSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
FMSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
FMSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FMSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FMSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

FHPFX

FHPFX Risk / Return Rank: 36
FHPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
FHPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
FHPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FHPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
FHPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMSFX vs. FHPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Mortgage Securities Fund (FMSFX) and Fidelity Series Investment Grade Securitized Fund (FHPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FMSFX	FHPFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	1.55	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.31	2.34	-0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.28	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.15	2.39	-0.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.71	7.19	-0.49

FMSFX vs. FHPFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMSFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the FHPFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMSFX and FHPFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FMSFX vs. FHPFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMSFX drawdown since its inception was -18.81%, roughly equal to the maximum FHPFX drawdown of -17.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMSFX and FHPFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FMSFX	FHPFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.81%	-17.93%	-0.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.81%	-2.61%	-0.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.04%	-7.56%	-0.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.66%	-17.79%	-0.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.81%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.41%	-1.38%	-0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.92%	-4.51%	+2.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.90%	0.87%	+0.03%

Volatility

FMSFX vs. FHPFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Mortgage Securities Fund (FMSFX) and Fidelity Series Investment Grade Securitized Fund (FHPFX) have volatilities of 1.23% and 1.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FMSFX	FHPFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.23%	1.24%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.90%	2.95%	-0.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.94%	4.04%	-0.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.80%	6.69%	+0.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.14%	5.64%	-0.50%

FMSFX vs. FHPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMSFX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FHPFX's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

FMSFX vs. FHPFX - Dividend Comparison

FMSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, less than FHPFX's 4.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHPFX Fidelity Series Investment Grade Securitized Fund	4.50%	4.41%	4.54%	3.53%	1.70%	0.58%	3.20%	3.81%	1.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FMSFX Fidelity Mortgage Securities Fund	3.92%	3.93%	4.12%	3.50%	1.43%	0.62%	2.40%	2.62%	2.57%	2.60%	2.65%	2.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FMSFX and FHPFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, FMSFX and FHPFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FMSFX or FHPFX?

FHPFX has higher volatility (1.24%) compared to FMSFX (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMSFX dropped -18.81% vs FHPFX's -17.93%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHPFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.