PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMREX vs. FIRQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMREX vs. FIRQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Retirement 2030 Fund Class K (FMREX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund (FIRQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMREX achieves a 5.11% return, which is significantly higher than FIRQX's 3.60% return.


FMREX

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.00%
6M
5.11%
YTD
5.11%
1Y
11.87%
3Y*
10.96%
5Y*
4.51%
10Y*

FIRQX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.44%
6M
3.60%
YTD
3.60%
1Y
7.94%
3Y*
7.27%
5Y*
2.79%
10Y*
5.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMREX vs. FIRQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FMREX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2030 Fund Class K
5.11%14.45%7.18%12.74%-16.23%8.96%13.98%7.35%
FIRQX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund
3.60%9.97%4.48%8.52%-12.39%3.82%9.59%3.68%

Correlation

The correlation between FMREX and FIRQX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2019

0.93

The correlation between FMREX and FIRQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMREX vs. FIRQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMREX
FMREX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FMREX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMREX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMREX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FMREX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMREX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FIRQX
FIRQX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FIRQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIRQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIRQX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FIRQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIRQX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMREX vs. FIRQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2030 Fund Class K (FMREX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund (FIRQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMREXFIRQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.44

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

2.77

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.25

11.64

-0.39

FMREX vs. FIRQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMREX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the FIRQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMREX and FIRQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMREX vs. FIRQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMREX drawdown since its inception was -22.43%, smaller than the maximum FIRQX drawdown of -38.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMREX and FIRQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMREXFIRQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.43%

-38.01%

+15.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.59%

-3.45%

-2.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.71%

-5.19%

-2.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.43%

-17.04%

-5.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.00%

-0.44%

-1.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.15%

-4.43%

-0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

0.82%

+0.48%

Volatility

FMREX vs. FIRQX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Managed Retirement 2030 Fund Class K (FMREX) has a higher volatility of 2.90% compared to Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund (FIRQX) at 2.05%. This indicates that FMREX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIRQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMREXFIRQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

2.05%

+0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.17%

3.72%

+2.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.35%

4.38%

+2.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.91%

5.60%

+3.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.05%

5.35%

+4.70%

FMREX vs. FIRQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMREX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FIRQX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMREX vs. FIRQX - Dividend Comparison

FMREX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than FIRQX's 3.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIRQX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund
3.30%3.14%2.95%2.75%5.01%6.00%3.50%3.15%5.59%16.31%2.43%4.08%
FMREX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2030 Fund Class K
2.83%2.59%2.49%2.50%4.13%4.80%3.05%1.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FMREX and FIRQX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FMREX has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to FIRQX (2.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMREX dropped -22.43% vs FIRQX's -38.01%.

FIRQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMREX and FIRQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer