PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMRDX vs. SSBRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMRDX vs. SSBRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2030 Fund Class I (FMRDX) and State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMRDX achieves a 7.23% return, which is significantly higher than SSBRX's 6.74% return.


FMRDX

1D
0.30%
1M
2.85%
YTD
7.23%
6M
7.77%
1Y
17.22%
3Y*
11.65%
5Y*
4.96%
10Y*

SSBRX

1D
0.15%
1M
2.05%
YTD
6.74%
6M
6.99%
1Y
15.84%
3Y*
11.97%
5Y*
5.49%
10Y*
7.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMRDX vs. SSBRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FMRDX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2030 Fund Class I
7.23%14.26%7.09%12.60%-16.25%8.89%13.79%7.30%
SSBRX
State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund
6.74%12.93%8.73%13.61%-15.51%10.03%14.68%7.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FMRDX and SSBRX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2019

0.96

The correlation between FMRDX and SSBRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMRDX vs. SSBRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMRDX
FMRDX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FMRDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMRDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMRDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FMRDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMRDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

SSBRX
SSBRX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SSBRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSBRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSBRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SSBRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSBRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMRDX vs. SSBRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2030 Fund Class I (FMRDX) and State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMRDXSSBRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.58

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

3.58

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.32

16.33

-3.00

FMRDX vs. SSBRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMRDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the SSBRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMRDX and SSBRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMRDXSSBRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

2.91

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.62

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.74

+0.03

Drawdowns

FMRDX vs. SSBRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMRDX drawdown since its inception was -22.50%, roughly equal to the maximum SSBRX drawdown of -21.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMRDX and SSBRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMRDXSSBRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.50%

-21.96%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.68%

-4.44%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.76%

-7.48%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.50%

-21.13%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.23%

-3.72%

-1.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

0.97%

+0.33%

Volatility

FMRDX vs. SSBRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2030 Fund Class I (FMRDX) has a higher volatility of 2.64% compared to State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX) at 1.74%. This indicates that FMRDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSBRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMRDXSSBRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

1.74%

+0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.87%

4.36%

+1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.06%

5.48%

+1.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.87%

8.83%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.03%

9.82%

+0.21%

FMRDX vs. SSBRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMRDX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than SSBRX's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMRDX vs. SSBRX - Dividend Comparison

FMRDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, less than SSBRX's 5.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMRDX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2030 Fund Class I
2.46%2.50%2.49%2.38%4.02%4.73%2.98%1.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SSBRX
State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund
5.68%6.07%6.67%4.60%6.60%6.44%4.74%6.58%5.35%0.60%1.84%2.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FMRDX and SSBRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FMRDX has higher volatility (2.64%) compared to SSBRX (1.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMRDX dropped -22.50% vs SSBRX's -21.96%.

SSBRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMRDX and SSBRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer