PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMRDX vs. NASDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMRDX vs. NASDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2030 Fund Class I (FMRDX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMRDX achieves a 7.23% return, which is significantly lower than NASDX's 21.38% return.


FMRDX

1D
0.30%
1M
2.85%
YTD
7.23%
6M
7.77%
1Y
17.22%
3Y*
11.65%
5Y*
4.96%
10Y*

NASDX

1D
0.47%
1M
10.94%
YTD
21.38%
6M
19.90%
1Y
42.08%
3Y*
32.65%
5Y*
20.44%
10Y*
22.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMRDX vs. NASDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FMRDX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2030 Fund Class I
7.23%14.26%7.09%12.60%-16.25%8.89%13.79%7.30%
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
21.38%21.00%36.91%54.69%-32.57%27.32%48.59%15.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FMRDX and NASDX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2019

0.79

The correlation between FMRDX and NASDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMRDX vs. NASDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMRDX
FMRDX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FMRDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMRDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMRDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FMRDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMRDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

NASDX
NASDX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NASDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NASDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
NASDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
NASDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
NASDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMRDX vs. NASDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2030 Fund Class I (FMRDX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMRDXNASDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.46

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

3.65

-0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.32

14.16

-0.84

FMRDX vs. NASDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMRDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the NASDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMRDX and NASDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMRDXNASDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

2.70

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.89

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.33

+0.44

Drawdowns

FMRDX vs. NASDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMRDX drawdown since its inception was -22.50%, smaller than the maximum NASDX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMRDX and NASDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMRDXNASDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.50%

-83.16%

+60.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.68%

-11.90%

+6.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.76%

-22.71%

+14.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.50%

-35.33%

+12.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.23%

-34.37%

+29.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

3.06%

-1.76%

Volatility

FMRDX vs. NASDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2030 Fund Class I (FMRDX) is 2.64%, while Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) has a volatility of 4.51%. This indicates that FMRDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NASDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMRDXNASDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

4.51%

-1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.87%

12.19%

-6.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.06%

16.10%

-9.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.87%

23.06%

-14.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.03%

22.68%

-12.65%

FMRDX vs. NASDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMRDX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than NASDX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMRDX vs. NASDX - Dividend Comparison

FMRDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, less than NASDX's 2.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMRDX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2030 Fund Class I
2.46%2.50%2.49%2.38%4.02%4.73%2.98%1.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
2.98%3.76%16.95%7.61%3.75%2.59%1.28%7.09%2.47%1.65%0.75%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMRDX and NASDX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NASDX has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to FMRDX (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMRDX dropped -22.50% vs NASDX's -83.16%.

NASDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMRDX and NASDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer