PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMNDX vs. FLAAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMNDX vs. FLAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (FMNDX) and Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund (FLAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMNDX achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly lower than FLAAX's 1.21% return. Over the past 10 years, FMNDX has underperformed FLAAX with an annualized return of 1.61%, while FLAAX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.79% annualized return.


FMNDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.22%
YTD
1.01%
6M
1.38%
1Y
2.96%
3Y*
3.19%
5Y*
2.11%
10Y*
1.61%

FLAAX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.64%
YTD
1.21%
6M
1.57%
1Y
5.58%
3Y*
3.50%
5Y*
-0.77%
10Y*
1.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMNDX vs. FLAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMNDX
Fidelity Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class
1.01%3.31%3.04%3.37%-0.09%0.03%0.86%2.00%1.58%1.10%
FLAAX
Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund
1.21%2.78%2.58%6.52%-16.29%3.89%5.64%9.03%0.50%8.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FMNDX and FLAAX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.36

The correlation between FMNDX and FLAAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.46 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMNDX vs. FLAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMNDX
FMNDX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FMNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FMNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

FLAAX
FLAAX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FLAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FLAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMNDX vs. FLAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (FMNDX) and Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund (FLAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMNDXFLAAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.45

1.51

+1.94

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.99

1.94

+8.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

41.56

5.68

+35.88

FMNDX vs. FLAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMNDX Sharpe Ratio is 3.17, which is higher than the FLAAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMNDX and FLAAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMNDXFLAAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.17

2.08

+1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.99

-0.17

+2.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.78

0.39

+1.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.70

0.92

+0.77

Drawdowns

FMNDX vs. FLAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMNDX drawdown since its inception was -1.69%, smaller than the maximum FLAAX drawdown of -21.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMNDX and FLAAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMNDXFLAAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.69%

-21.01%

+19.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.30%

-3.07%

+2.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.09%

-6.04%

+4.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.09%

-21.01%

+19.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-1.69%

-21.01%

+19.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.23%

+5.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.10%

-2.74%

+2.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

1.04%

-0.97%

Volatility

FMNDX vs. FLAAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (FMNDX) is 0.27%, while Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund (FLAAX) has a volatility of 1.16%. This indicates that FMNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMNDXFLAAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.27%

1.16%

-0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.63%

2.17%

-1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94%

2.86%

-1.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.06%

4.55%

-3.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.91%

4.66%

-3.75%

FMNDX vs. FLAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMNDX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FLAAX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMNDX vs. FLAAX - Dividend Comparison

FMNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, less than FLAAX's 3.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLAAX
Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund
3.89%4.21%3.85%3.55%3.39%2.83%3.07%3.69%3.72%3.65%3.79%3.84%
FMNDX
Fidelity Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class
2.82%2.95%2.99%2.60%0.61%0.23%0.85%1.58%1.46%1.00%0.75%0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMNDX and FLAAX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLAAX has higher volatility (1.16%) compared to FMNDX (0.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMNDX dropped -1.69% vs FLAAX's -21.01%.

FMNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMNDX and FLAAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer