PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMNDX vs. AFB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMNDX vs. AFB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (FMNDX) and AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund (AFB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMNDX achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly lower than AFB's 6.20% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FMNDX having a 1.61% annualized return and AFB not far behind at 1.60%.


FMNDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.22%
YTD
1.01%
6M
1.38%
1Y
2.96%
3Y*
3.19%
5Y*
2.11%
10Y*
1.61%

AFB

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.72%
YTD
6.20%
6M
5.81%
1Y
15.69%
3Y*
7.29%
5Y*
-1.26%
10Y*
1.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMNDX vs. AFB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FMNDX
Fidelity Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class
1.01%3.31%3.04%3.37%-0.09%0.03%0.86%2.00%1.58%1.10%
AFB
AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund
6.20%4.41%4.10%7.41%-25.93%7.25%7.80%20.13%-5.43%6.15%

Correlation

The correlation between FMNDX and AFB is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.14

The correlation between FMNDX and AFB shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.24 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMNDX vs. AFB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMNDX
FMNDX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FMNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FMNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

AFB
AFB Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
AFB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFB Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
AFB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFB Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMNDX vs. AFB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (FMNDX) and AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund (AFB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMNDXAFBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.17

2.01

+1.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

8.51

3.26

+5.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

3.45

1.39

+2.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

9.99

2.64

+7.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

41.56

9.98

+31.58

FMNDX vs. AFB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMNDX Sharpe Ratio is 3.17, which is higher than the AFB Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMNDX and AFB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMNDXAFBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.17

2.01

+1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.99

-0.12

+2.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.78

0.14

+1.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.70

0.33

+1.37

Drawdowns

FMNDX vs. AFB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMNDX drawdown since its inception was -1.69%, smaller than the maximum AFB drawdown of -50.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMNDX and AFB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMNDXAFBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.69%

-50.98%

+49.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.30%

-5.96%

+5.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.09%

-16.32%

+15.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.09%

-35.17%

+34.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-1.69%

-35.17%

+33.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-9.57%

+9.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.10%

-8.98%

+8.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

1.58%

-1.51%

Volatility

FMNDX vs. AFB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (FMNDX) is 0.27%, while AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund (AFB) has a volatility of 2.64%. This indicates that FMNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AFB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMNDXAFBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.27%

2.64%

-2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.63%

5.73%

-5.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94%

7.88%

-6.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.06%

10.94%

-9.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.91%

11.24%

-10.33%

FMNDX vs. AFB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMNDX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than AFB's 1.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMNDX vs. AFB - Dividend Comparison

FMNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, less than AFB's 5.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFB
AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund
5.02%4.72%3.83%3.62%5.26%4.32%4.18%3.93%4.53%4.71%5.34%5.80%
FMNDX
Fidelity Conservative Income Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class
2.82%2.95%2.99%2.60%0.61%0.23%0.85%1.58%1.46%1.00%0.75%0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMNDX and AFB have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AFB has higher volatility (2.64%) compared to FMNDX (0.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMNDX dropped -1.69% vs AFB's -50.98%.

FMNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMNDX and AFB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer