FMIMX vs. ATGAX
FMIMX (FMI Common Stock Fund) and ATGAX (Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FMIMX charges 1.01%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for ATGAX.
Performance
FMIMX vs. ATGAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FMIMX
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 4.03%
- YTD
- 8.99%
- 6M
- 8.45%
- 1Y
- 11.27%
- 3Y*
- 12.60%
- 5Y*
- 8.72%
- 10Y*
- 11.03%
ATGAX
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FMIMX vs. ATGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FMIMX FMI Common Stock Fund | 0.66% |
ATGAX Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund | 2.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMIMX and ATGAX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMIMX vs. ATGAX — Risk / Return Rank
FMIMX
ATGAX
FMIMX vs. ATGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FMI Common Stock Fund (FMIMX) and Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund (ATGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FMIMX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.97 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.43 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FMIMX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 58.33 | -57.82 |
Drawdowns
FMIMX vs. ATGAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMIMX drawdown since its inception was -59.09%, which is greater than ATGAX's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMIMX and ATGAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMIMX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.09% | 0.00% | -59.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.54% | 0.00% | -4.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.45% | 0.00% | -10.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.52% | — | — |
Volatility
FMIMX vs. ATGAX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMIMX | ATGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.56% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.31% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.14% | 9.26% | +7.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.66% | 9.26% | +9.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.26% | 9.26% | +10.00% |
FMIMX vs. ATGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMIMX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than ATGAX's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMIMX vs. ATGAX - Dividend Comparison
FMIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.15%, while ATGAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATGAX Aquila Opportunity Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FMIMX FMI Common Stock Fund | 12.15% | 13.24% | 2.01% | 2.84% | 6.65% | 12.44% | 0.76% | 4.93% | 10.17% | 11.82% | 4.92% | 10.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, FMIMX and ATGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for FMIMX and ATGAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer