PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMET vs. IYZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FMET vs. IYZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Metaverse ETF (FMET) and iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF (IYZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FMET vs. IYZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
-12.10%21.93%6.76%39.18%-16.56%
IYZ
iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF
16.87%29.28%20.53%3.90%-21.95%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMET achieves a -12.10% return, which is significantly lower than IYZ's 16.87% return.


FMET

1D
0.72%
1M
-4.50%
YTD
-12.10%
6M
-15.78%
1Y
13.47%
3Y*
10.78%
5Y*
10Y*

IYZ

1D
0.38%
1M
-1.44%
YTD
16.87%
6M
22.58%
1Y
46.59%
3Y*
22.07%
5Y*
6.25%
10Y*
4.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FMET vs. IYZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMET has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than IYZ's 0.42% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FMET vs. IYZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMET
FMET Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FMET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMET Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMET Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FMET Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMET Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

IYZ
IYZ Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
IYZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYZ Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
IYZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMET vs. IYZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Metaverse ETF (FMET) and iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF (IYZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FMETIYZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.55

2.51

-1.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.98

3.14

-2.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.45

-0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

4.23

-3.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.84

18.54

-16.70

FMET vs. IYZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMET Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the IYZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMET and IYZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FMETIYZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

2.51

-1.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.05

+0.26

Correlation

The correlation between FMET and IYZ is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FMET vs. IYZ - Dividend Comparison

FMET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than IYZ's 1.70% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMET
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
0.63%0.81%0.44%0.40%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IYZ
iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF
1.70%2.04%1.94%2.27%2.55%2.51%2.60%2.36%2.15%3.54%2.27%1.98%

Drawdowns

FMET vs. IYZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMET drawdown since its inception was -29.22%, smaller than the maximum IYZ drawdown of -77.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMET and IYZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FMETIYZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.22%

-77.11%

+47.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.00%

-11.12%

-11.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.14%

-3.28%

-15.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.49%

-40.40%

+32.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.99%

2.54%

+5.45%

Volatility

FMET vs. IYZ - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Metaverse ETF (FMET) has a higher volatility of 7.52% compared to iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF (IYZ) at 6.93%. This indicates that FMET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FMETIYZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.52%

6.93%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.01%

12.82%

+2.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.41%

18.68%

+5.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.29%

18.31%

+5.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.29%

19.06%

+5.23%