FMCE vs. PSMD
FMCE (FM Compounders Equity ETF) and PSMD (Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FMCE returned 12.07% vs 13.69% for PSMD. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FMCE charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PSMD.
Performance
FMCE vs. PSMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMCE achieves a 6.86% return, which is significantly higher than PSMD's 4.91% return.
FMCE
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 6.86%
- 6M
- 6.05%
- 1Y
- 12.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSMD
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 4.91%
- 6M
- 5.01%
- 1Y
- 13.69%
- 3Y*
- 12.16%
- 5Y*
- 8.98%
- 10Y*
- —
FMCE vs. PSMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FMCE FM Compounders Equity ETF | 6.86% | 11.11% | -2.72% |
PSMD Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF | 4.91% | 11.45% | 0.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMCE and PSMD is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2024 | 0.75 |
The correlation between FMCE and PSMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMCE vs. PSMD — Risk / Return Rank
FMCE
PSMD
FMCE vs. PSMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FM Compounders Equity ETF (FMCE) and Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF (PSMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FMCE | PSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.49 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 3.11 | -1.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.94 | 16.22 | -12.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FMCE vs. PSMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMCE drawdown since its inception was -11.69%, roughly equal to the maximum PSMD drawdown of -11.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMCE and PSMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMCE | PSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.69% | -11.96% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.77% | -4.42% | -6.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -11.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.49% | -0.73% | -0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.37% | -1.65% | -0.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 0.85% | +2.22% |
Volatility
FMCE vs. PSMD - Volatility Comparison
FM Compounders Equity ETF (FMCE) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF (PSMD) at 1.93%. This indicates that FMCE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMCE | PSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.20% | 1.93% | +2.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.17% | 4.78% | +5.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.73% | 5.75% | +6.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.39% | 8.63% | +5.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.39% | 8.47% | +5.92% |
FMCE vs. PSMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMCE has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than PSMD's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMCE vs. PSMD - Dividend Comparison
FMCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, while PSMD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMCE FM Compounders Equity ETF | 2.99% | 3.20% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSMD Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMCE and PSMD have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FMCE has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to PSMD (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMCE dropped -11.69% vs PSMD's -11.96%.
On 1-year performance, PSMD leads with 13.69% vs 12.07% for FMCE. On fees, FMCE is cheaper at 0.72% per year. On volatility, PSMD has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PSMD has performed better with a 13.69% return vs 12.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FMCE is cheaper with a 0.72% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSMD.
FMCE has the higher dividend yield at 2.99%, compared with 0.00% for PSMD.
They also come from different issuers: First Manhattan and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for FMCE and 0.75% for PSMD.
PSMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FMCE and PSMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer