FM vs. ECOW

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Frontier 100 ETF (FM) and Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW).

FM and ECOW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Frontier Markets 100 Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2012. ECOW is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 Index. It was launched on May 2, 2019. Both FM and ECOW are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

FM vs. ECOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Frontier 100 ETF (FM) and Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FM vs. ECOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FM iShares MSCI Frontier 100 ETF	0.00%	0.18%	7.25%	7.12%	-24.43%	24.36%	-3.36%	9.29%
ECOW Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF	9.29%	32.50%	3.17%	15.79%	-19.28%	7.47%	-2.51%	10.37%

Returns By Period

FM

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ECOW

• 1D: 2.44%
• 1M: -4.14%
• YTD: 9.29%
• 6M: 12.97%
• 1Y: 37.65%
• 3Y*: 18.71%
• 5Y*: 6.93%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FM vs. ECOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

FM has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than ECOW's 0.70% expense ratio.

FM

iShares MSCI Frontier 100 ETF

ECOW

Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF

Return for Risk

FM vs. ECOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ECOW

ECOW Risk / Return Rank: 93
ECOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ECOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
ECOW Omega Ratio Rank: 95
ECOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
ECOW Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FM vs. ECOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Frontier 100 ETF (FM) and Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FM	ECOW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.28	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.36	—

Correlation

The correlation between FM and ECOW is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FM vs. ECOW - Dividend Comparison

FM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ECOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FM iShares MSCI Frontier 100 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	3.95%	3.62%	2.70%	2.04%	2.91%	3.12%	4.29%	2.04%	2.15%	2.76%
ECOW Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF	4.76%	5.20%	7.35%	5.46%	7.50%	4.39%	3.35%	8.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FM	ECOW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-40.27%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.09%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.67%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-4.82%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-11.29%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.63%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FM	ECOW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.25%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.25%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	16.60%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	17.66%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	20.26%	—