PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLYRX vs. XPTFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLYRX vs. XPTFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pioneer Floating Rate Fund (FLYRX) and Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund (XPTFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLYRX achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly lower than XPTFX's 3.23% return.


FLYRX

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.56%
YTD
1.58%
6M
2.36%
1Y
5.00%
3Y*
5.84%
5Y*
3.97%
10Y*
3.97%

XPTFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.49%
YTD
3.23%
6M
3.36%
1Y
7.44%
3Y*
7.97%
5Y*
6.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLYRX vs. XPTFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLYRX
Pioneer Floating Rate Fund
1.58%4.90%6.94%8.31%-3.26%4.32%2.10%7.57%0.17%3.27%
XPTFX
Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund
3.23%7.47%8.62%8.55%3.74%1.91%2.18%4.70%4.47%-0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between FLYRX and XPTFX is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.09

The correlation between FLYRX and XPTFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLYRX vs. XPTFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLYRX
FLYRX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FLYRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLYRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLYRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FLYRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLYRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

XPTFX
XPTFX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XPTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
XPTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLYRX vs. XPTFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pioneer Floating Rate Fund (FLYRX) and Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund (XPTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLYRXXPTFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.72

4.22

-2.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.34

3.81

+1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.76

11.98

+3.77

FLYRX vs. XPTFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLYRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the XPTFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLYRX and XPTFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLYRX vs. XPTFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLYRX drawdown since its inception was -30.67%, which is greater than XPTFX's maximum drawdown of -2.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLYRX and XPTFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLYRXXPTFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.67%

-2.95%

-27.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.94%

-1.96%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.05%

-2.95%

+0.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.61%

-2.95%

-3.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

0.00%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.98%

-0.26%

-1.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.32%

0.62%

-0.30%

Volatility

FLYRX vs. XPTFX - Volatility Comparison

Pioneer Floating Rate Fund (FLYRX) has a higher volatility of 0.65% compared to Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund (XPTFX) at 0.21%. This indicates that FLYRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XPTFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLYRXXPTFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.65%

0.21%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.75%

2.89%

-1.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48%

2.95%

-0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.68%

2.53%

+0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.59%

2.01%

+1.58%

FLYRX vs. XPTFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLYRX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XPTFX's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLYRX vs. XPTFX - Dividend Comparison

FLYRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.28%, more than XPTFX's 6.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLYRX
Pioneer Floating Rate Fund
7.28%7.48%5.87%6.45%5.40%3.46%3.91%5.01%4.70%4.13%3.88%3.85%
XPTFX
Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund
6.02%7.24%6.78%6.66%5.70%2.21%2.74%4.62%4.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLYRX and XPTFX have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLYRX has higher volatility (0.65%) compared to XPTFX (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLYRX dropped -30.67% vs XPTFX's -2.95%.

XPTFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLYRX and XPTFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer