PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLYD vs. SVIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLYD vs. SVIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) and Volatility Shares -1x Short VIX Futures ETF (SVIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLYD vs. SVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FLYD
MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs
31.58%-60.42%-54.13%-75.14%-46.23%
SVIX
Volatility Shares -1x Short VIX Futures ETF
-35.16%-4.49%-32.76%157.37%42.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLYD achieves a 31.58% return, which is significantly higher than SVIX's -35.16% return.


FLYD

1D
-12.05%
1M
19.00%
YTD
31.58%
6M
12.07%
1Y
-60.68%
3Y*
-51.49%
5Y*
10Y*

SVIX

1D
9.17%
1M
-25.51%
YTD
-35.16%
6M
-26.52%
1Y
-22.76%
3Y*
-1.64%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLYD vs. SVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLYD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than SVIX's 1.47% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FLYD vs. SVIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLYD
FLYD Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
FLYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLYD Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
FLYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLYD Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

SVIX
SVIX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
SVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
SVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLYD vs. SVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) and Volatility Shares -1x Short VIX Futures ETF (SVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLYDSVIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.66

-0.31

-0.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.66

0.05

-0.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.01

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.73

-0.45

-0.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.83

-1.03

+0.20

FLYD vs. SVIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLYD Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is lower than the SVIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLYD and SVIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLYDSVIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.66

-0.31

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.72

0.02

-0.74

Correlation

The correlation between FLYD and SVIX is -0.59. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

FLYD vs. SVIX - Dividend Comparison

Neither FLYD nor SVIX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FLYD vs. SVIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLYD drawdown since its inception was -97.96%, which is greater than SVIX's maximum drawdown of -79.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLYD and SVIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLYDSVIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.96%

-79.30%

-18.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-82.41%

-49.47%

-32.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.97%

-69.03%

-27.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-82.45%

-30.26%

-52.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

72.38%

21.52%

+50.86%

Volatility

FLYD vs. SVIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) is 27.93%, while Volatility Shares -1x Short VIX Futures ETF (SVIX) has a volatility of 29.79%. This indicates that FLYD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SVIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLYDSVIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.93%

29.79%

-1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.96%

47.49%

+7.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

92.80%

74.62%

+18.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

83.50%

67.26%

+16.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.50%

67.26%

+16.24%