FLYD vs. SVIX

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

FLYD (MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) and SVIX (-1x Short VIX Futures ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLYD is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index, while SVIX is a Volatility fund tracking the Short VIX Futures Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FLYD returned -55.10%/yr vs -2.82%/yr for SVIX. Their -0.58 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. FLYD charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.47%/yr for SVIX.

Performance

FLYD vs. SVIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) and -1x Short VIX Futures ETF (SVIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLYD achieves a -35.79% return, which is significantly lower than SVIX's 0.29% return.

FLYD

• 1D: -4.90%
• 1M: -5.05%
• 6M: -41.66%
• YTD: -35.79%
• 1Y: -50.80%
• 3Y*: -55.10%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -63.67%

SVIX

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 2.27%
• 6M: 6.39%
• YTD: 0.29%
• 1Y: 43.11%
• 3Y*: -2.82%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FLYD MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs	$99.59K	$120.72K	$126.93K
SVIX -1x Short VIX Futures ETF	$63.36M	$58.73M	$62.64M

FLYD vs. SVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FLYD MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs	-35.79%	-60.42%	-54.13%	-75.14%	-46.63%
SVIX -1x Short VIX Futures ETF	0.29%	-4.49%	-32.76%	157.37%	47.63%

Correlation

The correlation between FLYD and SVIX is -0.60, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.60
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	-0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2022	-0.58

The correlation between FLYD and SVIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.60 to -0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FLYD vs. SVIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLYD

FLYD Risk / Return Rank: 3
FLYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FLYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
FLYD Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FLYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
FLYD Martin Ratio Rank: 0

SVIX

SVIX Risk / Return Rank: 30
SVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
SVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
SVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
SVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
SVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLYD vs. SVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) and -1x Short VIX Futures ETF (SVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLYD	SVIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.66	0.78	-1.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.71	1.30	-2.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.17	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.89	1.01	-1.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.66	2.88	-4.54

FLYD vs. SVIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLYD Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is lower than the SVIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLYD and SVIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLYD vs. SVIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLYD drawdown since its inception was -98.52%, which is greater than SVIX's maximum drawdown of -79.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLYD and SVIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLYD	SVIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.52%	-79.30%	-19.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.09%	-42.69%	-14.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-94.84%	-79.30%	-15.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.52%	-52.10%	-46.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-83.66%	-32.44%	-51.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.58%	15.03%	+15.55%

Volatility

FLYD vs. SVIX - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) has a higher volatility of 22.74% compared to -1x Short VIX Futures ETF (SVIX) at 14.02%. This indicates that FLYD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLYD	SVIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.74%	14.02%	+8.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	64.36%	42.65%	+21.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	76.85%	55.85%	+21.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	83.52%	65.75%	+17.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	83.52%	65.75%	+17.77%

FLYD vs. SVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLYD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than SVIX's 1.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLYD vs. SVIX - Dividend Comparison

Neither FLYD nor SVIX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLYD and SVIX in my portfolio?

FLYD and SVIX have a correlation of -0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLYD or SVIX?

FLYD has higher volatility (22.74%) compared to SVIX (14.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLYD dropped -98.52% vs SVIX's -79.30%.

Which ETF is better, FLYD or SVIX?

On 3-year performance, SVIX leads with -2.82% vs -55.10% for FLYD. On fees, FLYD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SVIX has been the lower-risk option at 14.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLYD or SVIX?

Over the 3-year period, SVIX has performed better with a -2.82% return vs -55.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLYD or SVIX?

FLYD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.47% for SVIX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLYD or SVIX?

FLYD and SVIX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FLYD and SVIX?

FLYD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SVIX is Volatility. FLYD tracks MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index, while SVIX tracks Short VIX Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: REX and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FLYD and 1.47% for SVIX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SVIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.