PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLXX.DE vs. EUPA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLXX.DE vs. EUPA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXX.DE) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE® Global Sector Value UCITS ETF (USD) (EUPA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLXX.DE achieves a 11.26% return, which is significantly higher than EUPA.DE's 8.36% return.


FLXX.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
2.45%
YTD
11.26%
6M
11.53%
1Y
17.29%
3Y*
13.86%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*

EUPA.DE

1D
0.63%
1M
-0.88%
YTD
8.36%
6M
9.89%
1Y
17.44%
3Y*
17.95%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLXX.DE vs. EUPA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FLXX.DE
Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF
11.26%1.91%22.15%4.07%
EUPA.DE
Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE® Global Sector Value UCITS ETF (USD)
8.36%18.38%13.54%11.13%

Correlation

The correlation between FLXX.DE and EUPA.DE is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2023

0.50

The correlation between FLXX.DE and EUPA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLXX.DE vs. EUPA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLXX.DE
FLXX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FLXX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

EUPA.DE
EUPA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
EUPA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUPA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUPA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
EUPA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUPA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLXX.DE vs. EUPA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXX.DE) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE® Global Sector Value UCITS ETF (USD) (EUPA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLXX.DEEUPA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.28

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

2.02

+1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.91

7.49

+4.42

FLXX.DE vs. EUPA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLXX.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the EUPA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLXX.DE and EUPA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLXX.DEEUPA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

1.57

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

1.30

-0.64

Drawdowns

FLXX.DE vs. EUPA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLXX.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.26%, which is greater than EUPA.DE's maximum drawdown of -10.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXX.DE and EUPA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLXX.DEEUPA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.26%

-10.28%

-23.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.69%

-8.44%

+3.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.70%

-10.28%

-7.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

-2.77%

+1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.65%

-1.91%

-2.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.41%

2.28%

-0.87%

Volatility

FLXX.DE vs. EUPA.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXX.DE) is 2.53%, while Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE® Global Sector Value UCITS ETF (USD) (EUPA.DE) has a volatility of 3.63%. This indicates that FLXX.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUPA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLXX.DEEUPA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.53%

3.63%

-1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.87%

9.03%

-2.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.37%

10.84%

-1.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.48%

12.40%

+0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.47%

12.40%

+2.07%

FLXX.DE vs. EUPA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLXX.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than EUPA.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLXX.DE vs. EUPA.DE - Dividend Comparison

FLXX.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, while EUPA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EUPA.DE
Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE® Global Sector Value UCITS ETF (USD)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLXX.DE
Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF
2.53%2.74%2.38%2.81%3.08%2.25%2.56%3.19%3.27%0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLXX.DE and EUPA.DE have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLXX.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLXX.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EUPA.DE.

FLXX.DE is categorized as Global Equity Income, while EUPA.DE is Europe Equities. FLXX.DE tracks LibertyQ Global Dividend Index-NR, while EUPA.DE tracks Shiller Barclays CAPE® Global Sector. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FLXX.DE and 0.65% for EUPA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLXX.DE and EUPA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer