PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLXT.DE vs. IQQX.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLXT.DE vs. IQQX.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FLXT.DE) and iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF (IQQX.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLXT.DE achieves a 69.39% return, which is significantly higher than IQQX.DE's 13.33% return.


FLXT.DE

1D
-1.70%
1M
15.06%
YTD
69.39%
6M
74.66%
1Y
115.04%
3Y*
41.09%
5Y*
10Y*

IQQX.DE

1D
-0.33%
1M
-1.88%
YTD
13.33%
6M
13.65%
1Y
33.64%
3Y*
17.75%
5Y*
10.09%
10Y*
6.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLXT.DE vs. IQQX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FLXT.DE
Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation
69.39%19.89%30.42%25.56%-22.29%
IQQX.DE
iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF
13.33%14.78%12.48%8.98%-3.90%

Correlation

The correlation between FLXT.DE and IQQX.DE is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2022

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLXT.DE vs. IQQX.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLXT.DE
FLXT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FLXT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

IQQX.DE
IQQX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
IQQX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLXT.DE vs. IQQX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FLXT.DE) and iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF (IQQX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLXT.DEIQQX.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.78

1.57

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

12.64

5.55

+7.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

38.64

20.94

+17.70

FLXT.DE vs. IQQX.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLXT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 4.92, which is higher than the IQQX.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLXT.DE and IQQX.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLXT.DEIQQX.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.92

3.10

+1.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.15

0.21

+0.94

Drawdowns

FLXT.DE vs. IQQX.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLXT.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.16%, smaller than the maximum IQQX.DE drawdown of -69.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXT.DE and IQQX.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLXT.DEIQQX.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.16%

-69.45%

+38.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.05%

-6.18%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.16%

-20.28%

-10.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.86%

-2.62%

+0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.18%

-14.55%

+6.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

1.64%

+1.33%

Volatility

FLXT.DE vs. IQQX.DE - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FLXT.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.61% compared to iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF (IQQX.DE) at 2.93%. This indicates that FLXT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IQQX.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLXT.DEIQQX.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.61%

2.93%

+6.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.65%

8.61%

+10.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.26%

11.06%

+12.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.86%

13.01%

+8.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.86%

15.75%

+6.11%

FLXT.DE vs. IQQX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLXT.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IQQX.DE's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLXT.DE vs. IQQX.DE - Dividend Comparison

FLXT.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IQQX.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLXT.DE
Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IQQX.DE
iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF
3.12%3.64%4.84%5.36%6.66%4.62%3.16%4.85%5.09%4.16%4.03%4.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLXT.DE and IQQX.DE have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLXT.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLXT.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IQQX.DE.

FLXT.DE tracks FTSE Taiwan 30/18 Capped, while IQQX.DE tracks Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 50. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLXT.DE and 0.59% for IQQX.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLXT.DE and IQQX.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer